ArticleNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2025
Synergistic effects of sequential treatment with doxorubicin and zoledronic acid on anticancer effects in estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer cells.
Article in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Zoledronic acid (ZA), a bisphosphonate, is commonly used in breast cancer patients with bone metastases to treat hypercalcemia and osteolysis. Recent studies showed the anti-cancer effects of ZA in breast cancer. This study further explored the synergistic effects of sequential and nonsequential ZA and doxorubicin (DOX) administration on estrogen receptor (ER)-positive and -negative breast cancer cell lines. Anti-cancer and anti-invasion effects were evaluated using MTT and Matrigel invasion assays. The synergistic effects were analyzed using the Chou-Talalay method. The protein levels of invasive and angiogenic factors were assessed by western blot. ZA was found to inhibit the proliferation of ER-positive and -negative breast cancer cells in a concentration-dependent manner. When ZA and doxorubicin (DOX) were sequentially combined at nontoxic concentrations, synergistic effects were observed in sequential administrations with DOX followed by ZA only in ER-negative breast cancer cells. Conversely, the sequential and nonsequential treatments did not significantly differ in ER-positive breast cancer cells. Moreover, this sequential treatment significantly reduced cell invasion and MMP9, pNF-κB, and FGF2 protein levels in ER-negative cells. The results suggest that ZA potentially inhibits ER-negative cells by suppressing the canonical NF-κB pathway and its downstream proteins, MMP9 and FGF2. Furthermore, DOX pretreatment enhanced the ZA effect and increased cell sensitivity to ZA, leading to improved outcomes with lower concentrations and shorter drug exposure durations. When combined with DOX, ZA produced synergistic effects on cell proliferation and invasion when administered sequentially in ER-negative breast cancer cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39754678What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.