ArticleIndian journal of pediatrics2025
Unveiling the Burden of Sickle Cell Anemia: A Pilot Study Validating Dried Blood Spots for Newborn Screening.
Article in Indian journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Birth Prevalence of Sickle Cell Disease in India: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of neonatal screening · 2026Review
- Newborn Screening for Hemoglobinopathies and Thalassemias: Brief History, Recent Activities, and Global Status-2026.International journal of neonatal screening · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This hospital-based cross-sectional study aimed to screen newborns for sickle cell anemia immediately after birth and validate dried blood spot (DBS) samples against conventional venous blood samples (CBS) for hemoglobin variant analysis by HPLC. Among 751 newborns, 2.93% were found to have sickle cell trait. Hemoglobin variants were analyzed in both DBS and CBS samples, showing good agreement with 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity. Passing Bablok regression indicated minimal proportional bias, while Bland-Altman analysis showed a bias of 0.67, but the line of equality within the 95% CI of the bias indicated acceptable minimal systematic bias. The concordance correlation coefficient was 0.91 (p < 0.0001), Pearson's ρ (precision measure) was 0.967, and Cohen's kappa statistics gave a weighted kappa of 0.93, confirming no significant differences between the two methods. This study supports DBS as a reliable method for universal neonatal screening for sickle cell disease, demonstrating its potential for widespread clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39754675What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.