ArticleMagma (New York, N.Y.)2025
A quality assurance protocol for reliable and reproducible multi-TI arterial spin labeling perfusion imaging in rat livers.
Article in Magma (New York, N.Y.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- In vivoMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Reproducibility and quality assurance in MRI.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo establish an arterial spin labeling (ASL) protocol for rat livers that improves data reliability and reproducibility for perfusion quantification.
methodsThis study used respiratory-gated, single-slice, FAIR-based ASL imaging with multiple inversion times (TI) in rat livers. Quality assurance measures included: (1) introduction of mechanical ventilation to ensure consistent respiratory cycles by controlling the respiratory rate (45 bpm), tidal volume (10 ml/kg), and inspiration: expiration ratio (I:E ratio, 1:2), (2) optimization of the trigger window for consistent trigger points, and (3) use of fit residual map and coefficient of variance as metrics to assess data quality. We compared image quality, perfusion maps, and fit residual maps between mechanically ventilated and non-ventilated animals, as well as repeated ASL measurements (session = 4 per animal) in two mechanically ventilated animals.
resultsPerfusion measurements over multiple sessions in mechanically ventilated rats exhibited low perfusion data variability and high reproducibility both within and between liver lobes. Image quality and perfusion maps were significantly improved in mechanically ventilated animals compared to non-ventilated animals. DISCUSSION: The implementation of mechanical ventilation and optimized quality assurance protocols enhanced the reliability and reproducibility of FAIR-based multi-TI-ASL imaging in rat livers. Our findings demonstrate these measures as a robust approach for achieving consistent liver perfusion quantification in preclinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.