ReviewCurrent pain and headache reports2025
Efficacy, Indications, and Safety of Intrathecal Baclofen Pump: A Narrative Review.
Review in Current pain and headache reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparative pharmacotherapeutic efficacy and dose-related safety profiles of intrathecal baclofen: a systematic review and meta-analysis in neurological spasticity.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Outcomes of Low Back Placement of Intrathecal Pumps for Patients with Chronic Pain.Pain and therapy · 2026Article
- From reactive to proactive: Continuous protein monitoring for preventive health care.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Review
- Neurotoxicological Evaluation of Intrathecal Citrate Excipients: Calcium Homeostasis Disruption and Safety Implications in CNS Drug Delivery.Pharmaceutics · 2025Article
- Article
- New Perspectives on the Efficacy of Catgut Embedment in Acupoint Combined with Rehabilitation Training for Pediatric-Cerebral-Palsy Motor Function Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Caring for patients with intrathecal baclofen pumps.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025Article
- Use of O-arm to place an intrathecal catheter through a bony fusion mass: case report.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewBaclofen, a muscle relaxant that reduces the release of excitatory neurotransmitters in the pre-synaptic neurons stimulating inhibitory neuronal signals in post-synaptic neurons, has been around for over 5 decades. Baclofen is used primarily for spasticity and since 1982, has had a role as an intrathecal agent. In the present investigation, we review research trends and updates on safety and efficacy of intrathecal baclofen (ITB) pumps. RECENT
findingsEvaluation of safety and efficacy of ITB pumps in spasticity and relevant conditions was evaluated in the present investigation. PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov were used to review appropriate related literature. Commonly reported aspects regarding ITB efficacy include comparison with alternative treatments, maintenance efficacy, and long-term outcomes. Safety considerations and risk factors associated with ITB include postoperative complications, withdrawal symptoms, tolerance issues, long-term management, and contraindications. In summary, the present investigation reveals that ITB is efficacious for muscle spasticity; however, efforts should be made to enhance safety and efficacy by providing improved best practice guidelines on maximum safe dose with the least amount of risk with individualized treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39754631What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.