Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39754610›Full record

ArticleProtoplasma2025

Antennal sensilla variability among castes and sexes in the leaf-cutter ant Acromyrmex subterraneus subterraneus.

Weslane Silva Noronha, Renan Dos Santos Araújo, Gustavo Ferreira Martins

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Protoplasma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Weslane Silva NoronhaDepartamento de Entomologia, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, MG, 36570-900, Brazil.
Renan Dos Santos AraújoInstituto de Ciências Biológicas E da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Pontal Do Araguaia, MT, 78698-000, Brazil. renandosantosaraujo@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8868-2012
Gustavo Ferreira MartinsDepartamento de Biologia Geral, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, MG, 36570-900, Brazil.

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES/Brasil) Finance Code 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insect antennae play a crucial role in communication, acting as receptors for both chemical and physical cues. This sensory reception is facilitated by specialized cuticular structures known as sensilla, which exhibit diverse morphologies and functions. In ants, caste polymorphism and sexual dimorphism manifest in antennal structure. This study characterized and compared the antennal sensilla across different castes (major and minor workers, and queens) and sexes of the leaf-cutter ant Acromyrmex subterraneus subterraneus, an important agricultural pest, using scanning electron microscopy. The lengths of the scape and pedicel were greater in major workers and queens compared to other classes of individuals (i.e., minor workers and males). Sensillum numbers were significantly higher for these two female classes than for minor workers and tended to be higher than for males. In addition, various types of sensilla were identified, including chaetic types I, II, and III, trichoid I and II, basiconic, ampullaceous, and coeloconic. Chaetic sensilla were found to be the most abundant in all classes of individuals studied. Overall, similar types of sensilla were found in females (major, minor, queen) and males. The differences in the presence, absence, and number of antennal sensilla were analyzed in relation to their functional roles across the studied groups.

Indexed as

AntsArthropod AntennaeSensillaAnimalsFemaleMaleMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningSex CharacteristicsChaetic sensillaInsect antennaeScanning electron microscopySensory organs

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.