ArticleClinical and translational allergy2025
Disease control and quality of life in chronic spontaneous urticaria and recurrent angioedema are strongly linked, but not in all patients.
Article in Clinical and translational allergy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research on chronic urticaria and angioedema: A bibliometric analysis of Web of Science Core Collection.Immunologic research · 2026Review
- Integrating Technology into Urticaria Management: Telemedicine, Remote Monitoring and Patient-Centered Care.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Biopsychosocial Insights on Adolescents With Chronic Urticaria: The Role of Eosinophils and Stress Coping Strategies.Clinical and translational allergy · 2025Article
- Acceptance and perceived usefulness of digital health services in the management of chronic urticaria: a survey of patients and physicians.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Disease control and quality of life in chronic spontaneous urticaria and recurrent angioedema are strongly linked, but not in all patients.Clinical and translational allergy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) help to assess disease control and quality of life (QoL) in chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) and recurrent angioedema (RA). This study aimed to assess the correlation between two different concepts: disease control and QoL, using disease-specific PROMs.
methodsWe analyzed data from 445 CSU and 330 RA patients who completed both a disease control and QoL PROM as part of the clinical routine. We included the UCT and CU-Q2oL for CSU and AECT and AE-QoL for RA.
resultsIn CSU and RA, disease control scores positively correlated with QoL scores (Spearman's rho correlation coefficient (CR) -0.757, -0.735; p < 0.001) with better disease control corresponding to better quality of life. However, 5.9% of CSU patients and 28% of RA patients with complete disease control had impaired QoL. In CSU, QoL was impaired in 69.2% of patients based on the CU-Q2oL and in 62.7% of patients based on a single numeric question from the UCT, with a mismatch in 89/445 patients. In RA, QoL was impaired in 58.5% using the AE-QoL and in 52.7% using a single numeric question from the AECT30mo, with a mismatch in 69/330 patients. Different domains of the QoL PROMs showed different degrees of influence on disease control, with "Itching/Embarrassment" showing the strongest correlation with the UCT (CR -0.804; p < 0.001) and "Functioning" with the AECT3mo (CR -0.824; p < 0.001).
conclusionAlthough most patients with controlled disease have better quality of life, unexpectedly, quality of life remains impaired in up to one-fourth of patients with completely controlled CSU and RA. Reasons behind this should be investigated in further studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.