ArticleBMC psychology2025
Learning environment as a predictor for medical students' empathy: a multicenter cross-sectional study from 12 medical schools in China.
Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perceived value, structural barriers, and academic burnout under the "hard science vs. soft skills" paradox: a cross-sectional study among Chinese medical students.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Parental education level and medical student engagement: a multi-center cross-sectional study.BMC psychology · 2025Article
- Top-tier ranking university bring worse perception of medical learning environment to students: a cross-sectional study across 12 universities.Medical education online · 2025Article
- The impact of grade point average on medical students' perception of the learning environment: a multicenter cross-sectional study across 12 Chinese medical schools.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Exploring Pain Empathy Among Doctors, Nurses and Patients: A Scoping Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Review
- Exploring the association between grade point average and work engagement: insights from a cross-sectional study of medical students.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEmpathy of medical students is crucial, yet it tends to decline as students enter later academic years. Empathy appeared to be affected by the learning environment (LE), which could be a potential contributor. We conducted a cross-sectional study to investigate the association between LE and empathy.
methodThe study comprised overall 10,901 medical students from 12 Chinese medical schools. Jefferson Scale of Empathy (JSE) was utilized to assess empathy, while a 5-point question and the Johns Hopkins Learning Environment Scale were employed to evaluate LE. JSE scores were compared across LE levels using Pearson Chi-square, Welch's ANOVA, and univariable linear regression. After adjusting for covariates, multivariable linear and logistic regression were used to assess the independent connection between LE and empathy. Confounders were controlled by stratified subgroup analysis.
resultsLE was significantly associated with medical students' empathy, as shown by the Pearson Chi-square test (p < 0.001) and Welch's ANOVA (p < 0.001). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, lower JSE scores were linked to common, bad, and terrible LE (OR = 2.226, 95% CI = [2.011, 2.465], p < 0.001; OR = 2.558, 95% CI = [1.745, 3.751], p < 0.001; OR = 1.889, 95% CI = [1.131, 3.153], p = 0.015), while excellent LE was associated with higher JSE scores (OR = 0.348, 95% CI = [0.312, 0.388], p < 0.001). Linear regression and stratified subgroup analysis confirmed logistic regression's findings.
conclusionLE was a significant predictor for empathy. Better LE was associated with higher empathy and worse LE was related to lower empathy. This inspired us to improve LE to enhance medical students' empathy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.