ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025
Comparative finite element analysis: internal fixation plate versus intramedullary nail for neer type III-VI proximal humeral fractur.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Kirschner wire-assisted positioning technique reduces operative time and fluoroscopy exposure in proximal humeral PHILOS plate placement: a retrospective comparative study.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFinite element analysis (FEA) could advance the understanding of fracture fixation and guide the choice of surgical treatment. This study aimed to compare two internal fixation methods in the treatment of displaced proximal humeral fracture (PHF) through FEA.
methodsThree-dimensional FEA model based on the left shoulder joint of a 67-year-old female patient with PHFs and osteoporosis was adopted, in order to analyze the fixation effect and load stress distribution of internal fixation plates with open reduction and intramedullary nails without opening the fracture in the treatment of Neer III-VI PHF.
resultsThe displacement of the distal humerus with intramedullary nail fixation was more obvious than that of the distal humerus with bone plate fixation, and the resistance of intramedullary nail fixation was less than that of bone plate fixation under the same stress load. Maximum stress on the screw when adopting the intramedullary nail fixation was smaller than that when adopting the internal fixation with the internal fixation plates. The strain data indicate that the strain of both the fixation device and the bone when adopting the internal fixation with the intramedullary nails is less than that when adopting the internal fixation with the internal fixation plates.
conclusionsBiomechanical analysis demonstrated that for complex fracture types with osteoporosis intramedullary nail system without opening the fracture had better stress dispersion than internal fixation plates with open reduction, and the risk of failure of central fixation was lower.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.