Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39754230›Full record

Trial reportJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025

Delta large-channel endoscopy versus unilateral biportal endoscopy decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Rushuo Wei, Weiqiang Liu, Mingdong Yu, Yushan Zhu, Ruzhan Yao, Bingwu Wang, Jesse Li-Ling

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rushuo WeiDepartment of Spinal Surgery, Weifang People's Hospital, Shandong Second Medical University, 151 Guangwen Street, Kuiwen District, Weifang, Shandong, 261000, China.
Weiqiang LiuDepartment of Spinal Surgery, Weifang People's Hospital, Shandong Second Medical University, 151 Guangwen Street, Kuiwen District, Weifang, Shandong, 261000, China.
Mingdong YuDepartment of Spinal Surgery, Weifang People's Hospital, Shandong Second Medical University, 151 Guangwen Street, Kuiwen District, Weifang, Shandong, 261000, China.
Yushan ZhuDepartment of Spinal Surgery, Weifang People's Hospital, Shandong Second Medical University, 151 Guangwen Street, Kuiwen District, Weifang, Shandong, 261000, China.
Ruzhan YaoDepartment of Spinal Surgery, Weifang People's Hospital, Shandong Second Medical University, 151 Guangwen Street, Kuiwen District, Weifang, Shandong, 261000, China. yrzspine@126.com.
Bingwu WangDepartment of Spinal Surgery, Weifang People's Hospital, Shandong Second Medical University, 151 Guangwen Street, Kuiwen District, Weifang, Shandong, 261000, China. bwwspinesci@163.com.
Jesse Li-LingCenter of Medical Genetics, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China.

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province ZR2022MH273Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province ZR2023LZY012Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province ZR2023MH360
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDelta large-channel endoscopy and unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) are prominent minimally invasive techniques for treating lumbar spinal stenosis, known for minimal tissue damage, clear visualization, and quick recovery. However, rigorous controlled research comparing these procedures is scarce, necessitating further investigation into their respective complications and long-term effectiveness. This randomized controlled trial aims to compare their perioperative outcomes, focusing on postoperative recovery and complications over time.

methodsIn total, 101 participants were randomly assigned to Delta large-channel endoscopy group (n = 50) or UBE group (n = 51). Primary measures were Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores and operation time. Secondary measures included VAS, EQ-5D, JOA scores, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay duration, and costs. Perioperative complications such as dural tears, incision infections, hematomas, thrombosis, and reoperation rates were recorded.

resultsThe Delta group consistently showed lower mean ODI scores throughout the follow-up than UBE group, with significant differences at 2 weeks postoperative (P = 0.048), though they were not significant by 1 month (P = 0.124), 2 months (P = 0.821) and 3 months (P = 0.350). Operation times were shorter in the Delta group (P < 0.001). Hospitalization costs and intraoperative blood loss were slightly higher in the UBE group (P < 0.001). No significant differences were noted in the other secondary outcomes at various post-surgery intervals, such as VAS, EQ-5D, JOA scores, hospital stay duration and complications.

conclusionBoth techniques are safe and effective when performed by experienced surgeons. Compared to UBE, Delta large-channel endoscopy can shorten surgery time and reduce blood loss, and more importantly, it promotes faster recovery of lumbar function in the early postoperative period. RESEARCH REGISTRATION UNIQUE IDENTIFYING NUMBER (UIN): Name of the registry: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry chictr.org.cn. ( http://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx ). Unique Identifying number or registration ID: ChiCTR2300076237. Hyperlink to your specific registration (must be publicly accessible and will be checked): https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=207 ,844.

Indexed as

Decompression, SurgicalEndoscopyLaminectomyLumbar VertebraeSpinal StenosisAgedFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimePostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeDelta large-channel endoscopyLumbar functionLumbar spinal stenosisUnilateral biportal endoscopy

Identifiers

PMID39754230
PMCPMC11699819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.