ReviewCritical care (London, England)2025
Visualizing hemodynamics: innovative graphical displays and imaging techniques in anesthesia and critical care.
Review in Critical care (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anaesthesia professionals' perspectives on ECG interpretation and arrhythmia situation awareness with Visual Patient Heart: a qualitative multicentre study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Mechanical ventilation in ARDS: navigating the fine line with real-time monitoring.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Review
- Transesophageal echocardiography in cardiac arrest: why, how, when, and where in clinical practice.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2026Review
- The Design and Application of Wearable Ultrasound Devices for Detection and Imaging.Biosensors · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The advancements in cardiovascular imaging over the past two decades have been significant. The miniaturization of ultrasound devices has greatly contributed to their widespread adoption in operating rooms and intensive care units. The integration of AI-enabled tools has further transformed the field by simplifying echocardiographic evaluations and enhancing the reproducibility of hemodynamic measurements, even for less experienced operators. Speckle tracking echocardiography offers a direct, visual, and quantitative assessment of myocardial shortening, serving as a compelling alternative to traditional methods for evaluating right and left ventricular systolic function. In critically ill patients, sublingual microcirculation imaging has revealed a high prevalence of microvascular alterations, which are markers of disease severity. The use of handheld vital microscopes enables the quantification of several key parameters, including vessel density, perfusion, red blood cell velocity, and the perfused vascular density. Such metrics are useful for evaluating microcirculatory health. The development of automated software marks a significant advance toward real-time bedside microvascular assessment. These advancements could eventually allow shock resuscitation to be tailored based on microvascular responses. In parallel with imaging advances, cardiac output monitors have evolved significantly. Once cumbersome devices displaying basic numerical data in tabular form, they now feature sleek, touch-screen interfaces integrated with visual decision-support tools. These tools synthesize hemodynamic data into intuitive graphical formats, allowing clinicians to quickly grasp the determinants of circulatory shock. This visual clarity supports more efficient and accurate decision-making, which may ultimately lead to improved patient care and outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.