ArticleCritical care (London, England)2025
Clinical impact of healthcare-associated infections in Brazilian ICUs: a multicenter prospective cohort.
Article in Critical care (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Minimizing hospital acquired intensive care unit infections: A focus on prevention.World journal of critical care medicine · 2026Review
- Oral normality alterations and the impact on pneumonia, sepsis, and bloodstream infections in critically ill patients: a prospective cohort study.Critical care science · 2026Article
- Risk factors and outcomes of healthcare-associated infections in a Brazilian intensive care unit: A cross-sectional study.Belitung nursing journal · 2026Article
- Evaluating nursing interventions to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infection in ICU patients: a quasi-experimental study.BMC nursing · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
32 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLimited data is available to evaluate the burden of device associated healthcare infections (HAI) [central line associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI), catheter associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI), and ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP)] in low and-middle-income countries. Our aim is to investigate the population attributable mortality fraction and the absolute mortality difference of HAI in a broad population of critically ill patients from Brazil.
methodsMulticenter cohort study from September 2019 to December 2023 with prospective individual patient data collection. VAP, CLABSI, and CAUTI were diagnosed by each center in accordance with Brazilian regulatory agency guidance. If a patient fulfilled all diagnostic criteria, he was deemed to have Confirmed HAI. An adjusted disability multistate model was used to evaluate the population attributable in-hospital mortality fraction (PAF) and the absolute in-hospital mortality difference (AMD).
resultsA total of 128,247 patients were included. 4066 (3.2%) distinct patients had at least one diagnosis of HAI (1493 CLABSI, 433 CAUTI, 2742 VAP, and 435 patients with more than one HAI) during the ICU stay. The PAF was 3.89% (95% CI 3.68-4.11%) for HAI, 2.16% (2.05-2.33%) for VAP, 1.2% (1.08-1.32%) for CLABSI, 0.11% (0.07-0.16%) for CAUTI, and 0.33% (0.26-0.4%) for ≥ 2 HAI. The AMD for HAI was 33.69% (95% CI 32.27-35.33%), 29.01% (27.15-30.98%) for VAP, 31.64% (29.3-34.81%) for CLABSI, 9.94% (3.88-15.54%) for CAUTI and 35.6% (28.93-42.99%) for ≥ 2 HAI.
conclusionsDevice-associated HAI significantly contribute to hospital mortality and impose a high excess risk of death for critically ill patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.