Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39754194›Full record

ArticleTrials2025

Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of an ACT and compassion-based intervention for women with breast cancer: study protocol of two randomised controlled trials {1}.

Inês A Trindade, Andreia Soares, David Skvarc, Diogo Carreiras, Joana Pereira, Óscar Lourenço, Filipa Sampaio, Bruno de Sousa, Teresa C Martins, Paula Boaventura and 3 more

Erratum issued 3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05642897 narecruitingnot on this map

Mind Programme for Women With Breast Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial Testing the Programme´s Cost-effectiveness and Efficacy in Changing Psychological and Biological Outcomes

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of CoimbraRan2023 to 2025Enrolled150ConditionsBreast Cancer FemaleArmsMind, Support Group
NCT06212414 naunknown statusnot on this map

Mind Programme for Women With Breast Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial Testing the Programme´s Cost-effectiveness and Efficacy in Changing Psychological and Biological Outcomes (Nationwide Coverage)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of CoimbraRan2023 to 2025Enrolled153ConditionsBreast Cancer FemaleArmsMind Programme, Support Group
NCT06852833 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

One-day Mind Programme for Women With Breast Cancer: A Pilot Study on the Acceptability and Effectiveness of a Brief ACT and Compassion-based Intervention on Breast Cancer-specific Outcomes

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of CoimbraRan2025 to 2027Enrolled40ConditionsBreast Cancer FemalesArmsOne-day Mind Programme for women with breast cancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Inês A TrindadeCenter for Health and Medical Psychology, School of Behavioural, Social and Legal Sciences, University of Örebro, Örebro, Sweden. ines.trindade@oru.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1208-2077
Andreia SoaresCenter for Research in Neuropsychology and Cognitive and Behavioral Intervention, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
David SkvarcSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Diogo CarreirasCenter for Research in Neuropsychology and Cognitive and Behavioral Intervention, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Joana PereiraCenter for Research in Neuropsychology and Cognitive and Behavioral Intervention, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Óscar LourençoCeBER, Faculty of Economics, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Filipa SampaioDepartment of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Bruno de SousaCenter for Research in Neuropsychology and Cognitive and Behavioral Intervention, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Teresa C MartinsCenter for Research in Neuropsychology and Cognitive and Behavioral Intervention, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Paula BoaventuraIPATIMUP - Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Joana Marta-SimõesCenter for Research in Neuropsychology and Cognitive and Behavioral Intervention, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Mind Project Team
Helena MoreiraCenter for Research in Neuropsychology and Cognitive and Behavioral Intervention, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia PTDC/PSI-GER/7847/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast cancer is the most diagnosed cancer in women worldwide and carries a considerable psychosocial burden. Interventions based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) and compassion-based approaches show promise in improving adjustment and quality of life in people with cancer. The Mind programme is an integrative ACT and compassion-based intervention tailored for women with breast cancer, which aims to prepare women for survivorship by promoting psychological flexibility and self-compassion. A pilot study of the Mind programme has shown acceptability and preliminary efficacy in improving quality of life and psychological health. This paper presents the study protocol of two randomised controlled trials that aim to test the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of an optimised version of the Mind programme in women with breast cancer.

methodsParticipants will be women diagnosed with breast cancer randomly assigned to the Mind programme or a support group intervention (active control) in a 1:1 ratio for study 1, while study 2 includes one more arm (treatment as usual; inactive control) and a 2:2:1 ratio. Both interventions will be delivered weekly via an 8-session face-to-face or online group format. Data will be collected at baseline, post-treatment and 6-month follow-up. The efficacy and cost-effectiveness of the two interventions will be assessed. Treatment outcomes will comprise cancer-specific quality of life (primary outcome), anxiety and depressive symptoms, psychological flexibility, self-compassion, health-related quality of life, resource use, and intervention's acceptability and feasibility. Study 1 will also include immunological and epigenetic markers associated with breast cancer prognosis and mental health. Outcome assessors will be blind to group allocation. Statistical analyses will be conducted using an intention-to-treat approach. Analyses of moderators and mediators of change will also be performed. DISCUSSION: These trials examine the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of an integrative ACT and compassion-based intervention tailored for women with breast cancer. Greater improvements in psychosocial, biological and resource use are expected in the Mind group, when compared to the control group(s). Results will likely support the potential benefits of the Mind programme for breast cancer patients and highlight the clinical relevance of integrative and holistic interventions in oncology. TRIALS REGISTRATION {2A, 2B}: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05642897 and NCT06212414. Registered on December 8, 2022, and January 18, 2024.

Indexed as

Acceptance and Commitment TherapyBreast NeoplasmsCost-Benefit AnalysisEmpathyHealth Care CostsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAdaptation, PsychologicalFemaleHumansMental HealthQuality of LifeTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeAcceptance and Commitment TherapyBreast cancerCompassion-Focused TherapyMind programmeRandomised controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID39754194
PMCPMC11697741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.