ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2025
Impact of neutrophil percentage-to-albumin ratio on mortality in iron-deficiency anemia patients: a retrospective study using MIMIC-IV database.
Article in European journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Neutrophil Percentage-to-Albumin Ratio: Unveiling a New Perspective on Mortality Risk in Intensive Care Unit Asthma Patients-A Retrospective Cohort Study.Mediators of inflammation · 2026Article
- Association of neutrophil-percentage-to-albumin ratio with mortality in older stroke survivors.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn the intensive care unit (ICU), the incidence of iron-deficiency anemia (IDA) is relatively high and is associated with various adverse clinical outcomes. Therefore, it is crucial to identify simple and practical indicators to assess the mortality risk in ICU patients with IDA. This study aims to investigate the relationship between the Neutrophil Percentage-to-Albumin Ratio (NPAR) levels in patients with IDA in the ICU and their all-cause mortality at 30 and 365 days. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe analyzed data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV (MIMIC-IV) 3.0 database spanning the years 2008-2022 and identified a cohort of 817 patients with IDA who met our inclusion criteria. Through multivariate Cox regression analysis, the relationship between NPAR levels and 30-day and 365-day mortality risks was assessed, and restricted cubic splines (RCS) models were used to explore potential nonlinear relationships. Additionally, an inflection point analysis was conducted to evaluate the potential of NPAR levels in predicting short- and long-term mortality risks.
resultsThe study found that high NPAR levels were significantly associated with an increased risk of 30-day and 365-day mortality in patients with IDA (hazard ratio [HR] range 1.49-2.23, p < 0.001 for all). The relationship between natural logarithmic transformation (ln) NPAR levels and 30-day and 365-day mortality risks exhibited an inverse "L" shaped pattern. Patient mortality risk increased significantly when ln-transformed NPAR levels exceeded 1.2 (HR range 3.366-4.304, p < 0.001 for all). Additionally, subgroup analyses did not reveal any significant interactions, indicating that the predictive effect of NPAR on mortality risk is relatively consistent across different subgroups.
conclusionWe found an inverse "L" shaped relationship between ln-transformed NPAR levels and 30-day and 365-day mortality risks, particularly when ln-transformed NPAR values exceed 1.2, which is significantly associated with an increased risk of death within 30 and 365 days for patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.