ArticleBMC neurology2025
Automatic segmentation of white matter lesions on multi-parametric MRI: convolutional neural network versus vision transformer.
Article in BMC neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated Deep Learning-Based Demyelination Load Segmentation in Metachromatic Leukodystrophy.Clinical neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Rethinking MS Therapeutics: From Disease Pathogenesis Mechanisms to AI-Driven Drug Discovery.Journal of neuroimmune pharmacology : the official journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeWhite matter hyperintensities in brain MRI are key indicators of various neurological conditions, and their accurate segmentation is essential for assessing disease progression. This study aims to evaluate the performance of a 3D convolutional neural network and a 3D Transformer-based model for white matter hyperintensities segmentation, focusing on their efficacy with limited datasets and similar computational resources. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe implemented a convolution-based model (3D ResNet-50 U-Net with spatial and channel squeeze & excitation) and a Transformer-based model (3D Swin Transformer with a convolutional stem). The models were evaluated on two clinical datasets from Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and National Center for High-Performance Computing. Four metrics were used for evaluation: Dice similarity coefficient, lesion segmentation, lesion F1-Score, and lesion sensitivity.
resultsThe Transformer-based model, with appropriate adjustments, outperformed the well-established convolution-based model in foreground Dice similarity coefficient, lesion F1-Score, and sensitivity, demonstrating robust segmentation accuracy. DRLoc enhanced the Transformer's performance, achieving comparable results on internal and benchmark datasets despite limited data availability.
conclusionWith comparable computational overhead, a Transformer-based model can surpass a well-established convolution-based model in white matter hyperintensities segmentation on small datasets by capturing global context effectively, making them suitable for clinical applications where computational resources are constrained.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.