Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39753996›Full record

ReviewPathologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025

[State of digitalization in dermatopathology].

Stephan A Braun, Paul Schmidle, Nicole Duschner, Jörg Schaller

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Digital Pathology in Dermatology - Current Status, Applications and Perspectives.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2026
    Review
  2. Digital Dermatology.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2026
    Review
  3. Defensive medicine in dermatological practice - Dermatopathology as a mirror of structural challenges.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stephan A BraunKlink für Hautkrankheiten, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Von-Esmarch-Str. 58, 48149, Münster, Deutschland. stephanalexander.braun@ukmuenster.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5600-0195
Paul SchmidleKlink für Hautkrankheiten, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Von-Esmarch-Str. 58, 48149, Münster, Deutschland.
Nicole DuschnerMVZ Dermatopathologie Duisburg Essen GmbH, Essen, Deutschland.
Jörg SchallerMVZ Dermatopathologie Duisburg Essen GmbH, Essen, Deutschland.

Funding

BMBF 01/S22004B
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As in general pathology, digitalization is also inexorably making its way into dermatopathology. This article examines the current state of digitalization in German dermatopathology laboratories based on the authors' own experiences, the current study situation, and a survey of members of the Dermatological Histology Working Group (ADH). Experiences with the establishment of a digital laboratory workflow, artificial intelligence (AI)-based assistance systems, and whole slide images (WSI)-based training programs are discussed. Digitalization in dermatopathology is an opportunity to simplify and accelerate processes, but there are some hurdles to overcome.

Indexed as

DermatologyImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPathologySkin DiseasesArtificial IntelligenceGermanyHumansWorkflowArtificial intelligenceEducationLaboratoriesSurveys and questionnairesWorkflow

Identifiers

PMID39753996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.