ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2025
Preoperative prediction of the selection of the NOTES approach for patients with symptomatic simple renal cysts via an interpretable machine learning model: a retrospective study of 264 patients.
Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Efficacy and Safety of Dehydrated Alcohol Versus Lauromacrogol for Sclerotherapy of Simple Renal Cysts: A Retrospective Comparison Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Giant Renal Parapelvic Cyst: A Diagnostic Conundrum.Cureus · 2025Article
- Effectiveness and safety of greenlight laser in ureteroscopic parapelvic cyst incision: a retrospective analysis.BMC urology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere are multiple surgical approaches for treating symptomatic simple renal cysts (SSRCs). The natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) approach has gradually been applied as an emerging minimally invasive approach for the treatment of SSRCs. However, there are no clear indicators for selecting the NOTES approach for patients with SSRCs. We aimed to investigate the preoperative clinical determinants that influence the selection of the NOTES approach in patients with SSRCs and to construct a prediction model to assist the surgeons in selecting the NOTES approach.
methodsClinical data from 264 patients with SSRCs from a single-center medical institution were included. Predictors were analyzed via the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator and multivariable logistic regression. Various machine learning classification algorithms were evaluated to determine the optimal model. An interpretive framework for personalized risk assessment was developed via SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP).
resultsPreoperative factors predicting the selection of the NOTES approach included cyst growth, the presence of renal calculus, body mass index, history of diabetes, history of cerebrovascular disease, hemoglobin level, and the platelet (PLT) count. The logistic classification model was identified as the optimal model, with area under the curve of 0.962, an accuracy of 0.868, a sensitivity of 0.889, and a specificity of 1.000 in the test set.
conclusionA logistic regression model was constructed and tested via the SHAP method, providing a scientific basis for selecting the NOTES approach for patients with SSRCs. This method offers effective decision support for doctors in choosing the NOTES approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39753974What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.