ArticleSurgical endoscopy2025
Deep learning-based pelvimetry in pelvic MRI volumes for pre-operative difficulty assessment of total mesorectal excision.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of preoperative MRI-based pelvimetry in predicting surgical difficulty in rectal cancer: Implications for personalised surgical planning.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2026Pooled it
- A fully automated CT-based pelvimetry pipeline for quantifying mid-pelvic surgical workspace in rectal cancer.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSpecific pelvic bone dimensions have been identified as predictors of total mesorectal excision (TME) difficulty and outcomes. However, manual measurement of these dimensions (pelvimetry) is labor intensive and thus, anatomic criteria are not included in the pre-operative difficulty assessment. In this work, we propose an automated workflow for pelvimetry based on pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) volumes.
methodsWe implement a deep learning-based framework to measure the predictive pelvic dimensions automatically. A 3D U-Net takes a sagittal T2-weighted MRI volume as input and determines five anatomic landmark locations: promontorium, S3-vertebrae, coccyx, dorsal, and cranial part of the os pubis. The landmarks are used to quantify the lengths of the pelvic inlet, outlet, depth, and the angle of the sacrum. For the development of the network, we used MRI volumes from 1707 patients acquired in eight TME centers. The automated landmark localization and pelvic dimensions measurements are assessed by comparison with manual annotation.
resultsA center-stratified fivefold cross-validation showed a mean landmark localization error of 5.6 mm. The inter-observer variation for manual annotation was 3.7 ± 8.4 mm. The automated dimension measurements had a Spearman correlation coefficient ranging between 0.7 and 0.87.
conclusionTo our knowledge, this is the first study to automate pelvimetry in MRI volumes using deep learning. Our framework can measure the pelvic dimensions with high accuracy, enabling the extraction of metrics that facilitate a pre-operative difficulty assessment of the TME.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.