Observational studyJournal of neuro-oncology2025
Creating a predictive model and online calculator for high-value care outcomes following glioblastoma resection: incorporating neighborhood socioeconomic status index.
Observational study in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSocial determinants of health including neighborhood socioeconomic status, have been established to play a profound role in overall access to care and outcomes in numerous specialized disease entities. To provide glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients with high-quality care, it is crucial to identify predictors of hospital length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, and access to postoperative adjuvant chemoradiation. In this study, we incorporate a novel neighborhood socioeconomic status index (NSES) and develop three predictive algorithms for assessing post-operative outcomes in GBM patients, offering a tool for preoperative risk stratification of GBM patients.
methodsAdult GBM patients who underwent surgical resection from a single center were identified; NSES was identified via patient street address of residence, with lower scores representing disadvantaged neighborhoods. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to predict high value care outcomes. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test was used to assess model calibration.
resultsA total of 467 patients were included, with a mean age of 59.85 ± 13.21 years and 58.7% being male. The mean NSES for our cohort was 63.77 ± 14.91, indicating that the majority resided in neighborhoods with a higher socioeconomic status compared to the national average NSES of 50. One hundred nine (23.3%) patients had extended LOS, 28.9% had non-routine discharge, and 19.1% did not follow the Stupp protocol following surgery. On multivariate regression, worse NSES was significantly and independently associated with extended LOS (OR = 0.981, p = 0.026), non-routine discharge disposition (OR = 0.984, p = 0.033), and non-compliance with the Stupp protocol (OR = 0.977, p = 0.014). Our three models predicting high-value care outcomes had acceptable C-statistics > 0.70, and all models demonstrated adequate calibration (p > 0.05). Final models are accessible via online calculator. https://neurooncsurgery4.shinyapps.io/GBM_NSES_Caclulator/
conclusionNSES scores are readily available and may be utilized via our open-access calculators. After external validation, our predictive models have the potential to assist in providing patients with individualized risk estimates for post-operative outcomes following GBM resection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39753906What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.