Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39753903›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2025

Evaluating round window niche visibility in cochlear implantation: anatomical insights and electrode insertion strategies.

Yesim Karagoz, Cigdem Kalaycik Ertugay, Direnç Özlem Aksoy, Ozdes Mahmutoglu, Abdullah Soydan Mahmutoglu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yesim KaragozDepartment of Radiology, Istanbul Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey. yesimkaragozozen@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1000-8271
Cigdem Kalaycik ErtugayDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Acıbadem Kozyatagi Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Direnç Özlem AksoyDepartment of Radiology, Istanbul Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ozdes MahmutogluDepartment of Radiology, University of Health Sciences Şişli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Abdullah Soydan MahmutogluDepartment of Radiology, Istanbul Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCochlear implantation (CI) surgery is essential for restoring hearing in individuals with severe sensorineural hearing loss. Accurate placement of the electrode within the cochlea is essential for successful auditory outcomes and minimizing complications. This study aims to analyze the relationship between the round window niche (RWN) alignment, its visibility during surgery, and the impact on surgical techniques and outcomes.

methodsA retrospective study was conducted, examining high-resolution computed tomography (CT) scans of the temporal bone from 103 patients who underwent CI. RWN visibility was assessed using the St. Thomas Hospital (STH) classification. Anatomical parameters such as the angles of RWN alignment relative to the lateral semicircular canal (LSCC) plane and the distances to the facial nerve were measured and recorded.

resultsThe analysis revealed that RWN alignment angles did not significantly correlate with RWN visibility. However, specific anatomical distances, such as the anteroposterior distance between the round window membrane (RWM) and the facial nerve, were significantly associated with improved RWN visibility.

conclusionPreoperative knowledge of RWN anatomy, particularly its relationship with the facial nerve, can reduce the complexity of CI surgery. Understanding these anatomical variations is essential for optimizing surgical outcomes. Future research should explore additional cochlear axis orientations to enhance surgical techniques and improve visibility assessments during CI procedures.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationHearing Loss, SensorineuralRound Window, EarAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolCochlear ImplantsFacial NerveFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesCochlear implantationHigh resolution computed tomographyRound window niche (RWN)RWN Visibility

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.