Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39753898›Full record

ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2025

LC-HRMS screening procedure for the detection of 11 different classes of prohibited substances in dried urine spots for doping control purposes.

Monica Mazzarino, Francesca Pizzolato, Lenka Honesová, Maria Tsivou, Günter Gmeiner, Peter Van Eenoo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Monica Mazzarino *Doping Control Laboratory, Department of Diagnostic Sciences, Ghent University, Block B, Ottergemsesteenweg 460, BE-9000, Ghent, Belgium. monica.mazzarino@ugent.be.
Francesca Pizzolato *Doping Control Laboratory, Seibersdorf Labor GmbH, Campus Seibersdorf, 2444, Seibersdorf, Austria.
Lenka HonesováDoping Control Laboratory, Department of Diagnostic Sciences, Ghent University, Block B, Ottergemsesteenweg 460, BE-9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Maria TsivouDoping Control Laboratory, Seibersdorf Labor GmbH, Campus Seibersdorf, 2444, Seibersdorf, Austria.
Günter GmeinerDoping Control Laboratory, Seibersdorf Labor GmbH, Campus Seibersdorf, 2444, Seibersdorf, Austria.
Peter Van EenooDoping Control Laboratory, Department of Diagnostic Sciences, Ghent University, Block B, Ottergemsesteenweg 460, BE-9000, Ghent, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dried urine spots have recently been proposed as an alternative matrix in the anti-doping field. Drying urine may open the opportunity to limit microbial and thermal degradation of the prohibited substances during transportation to the anti-doping laboratories without the need for refrigeration or freezing. In this study, a multi-targeted initial testing procedure was developed for the determination of 237 prohibited drugs/metabolites from 11 different classes in dried urine spots. The comparability between two different microsampling techniques (i.e., Whatman

Indexed as

Doping in SportsMass SpectrometrySubstance Abuse DetectionChromatography, LiquidHumansLimit of DetectionSolid Phase ExtractionUrinalysisDoping control analysisDried urine spotLiquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometryMicrobial and thermal degradation

Identifiers

PMID39753898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.