ArticleAnnals of hematology2025
The prognostic impact of 1q21 gain/amplification in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a retrospective study based on a single center in China.
Article in Annals of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Construction and Validation of a Progression-Free Survival Prediction Model for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients With 1q21 Gain/Amplification.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Multiple myeloma in the real world settings: prognostic significance of 1q21 chromosomal abnormalities - single center experience.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Real-world clinical outcomes of autologous stem cell transplantation in Chinese patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a systematic literature review.Therapeutic advances in hematology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
1q21gain/amp is the most common in patients with multiple myeloma. However, there is limited research on the prognostic heterogeneity of 1q21+, and the prognostic of the 1q21 copy remains controversial. In this study, we primarily conducted a retrospective analysis of the prognostic significance of 1q21 gain/amp in 375 newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients. 1q21 + was detected in 164 (43.7%) patients, including 103 (27.5%) with 3 copies and 61 (16.3%) with ≥ 4 copies. Patients with 1q21 + were more likely to be accompanied by anemia, hypercalcemia, t(4;14), and t(14;16). Compared with 1q21-, the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of 1q21 + are shorter(p <0.0001; p = 0.036). The PFS of 1q21 amp was shorter than 1q21 gain (p = 0.0072). When accompanied by other high-risk abnormalities, 1q21 + was associated with earlier disease progression (all p<0.05). There were no significant differences in survival outcomes among patients with 1q21 gain alone, 1q21 amp alone, and FISH-. Autologous stem cell transplantation can prolong the survival of 1q21 + patients (p = 0.00062). A predictive scoring system based on 1q21 gain, 1q21 amp, del(17p), t(14;16), ISS II/III, and high LDH categorizes patients into three groups: low-risk (44.8%), intermediate-risk (38.9%), and high-risk (16.3%) (p < 0.0001; p < 0.0001). 1q21 + showed a relatively poor prognosis when coexisted with other high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities, especially 1q21 amp. The risk scoring system based on 1q21 copies is a potential risk stratification tool for multiple myeloma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39753831What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.