ArticleCanadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie2025
Development of a patient-oriented transfer tool for transition from the intensive care unit to the ward: a mixed methods study.
Article in Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe use of patient/family-centred written summaries to supplement verbal information may be useful to improve knowledge and reduce anxiety related to patient transfer from the intensive care unit (ICU) to a hospital ward. We aimed to identify essential elements to include in an ICU-specific patient-oriented discharge summary tool (PODS-ICU).
methodsWe conducted a mixed methods study. Participants were ICU patients who were transitioning to a hospital ward and clinicians. We used a validated questionnaire to measure the relocation stress of patients, and standardized questions to qualitatively explore patients' needs during the transition, as well as perspectives of clinician stakeholders. Inductive thematic analysis was used for the qualitative analysis.
resultsWe recruited 22 participants, including ten patients and 12 clinician stakeholders. Of ten patients, 50-100% reported positive experiences during the transition and 10-30% reported negative experiences. From all participants' perspectives, we identified the following essential elements for the PODS-ICU: the reason for transition, a summary of the ICU course, a clinical update, destination ward details, medication reconciliation, a future care plan, and the planned follow-up by the ICU outreach team. Family presence and earlier notification of an upcoming transfer were identified as support needs to help patients prepare mentally and reduce transfer anxiety. Moreover, using positive communication with patients when providing transfer details and using the brief standardized transfer tool were recommended to improve transition care.
conclusionsWe identified informational gaps in patient and family knowledge at the time of transfer from the ICU to a ward, which informed essential elements for the PODS-ICU. The PODS-ICU may reduce transfer anxiety and improve care during the transition from the ICU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39753792What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.