ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2025
Respiratory support strategies in neonatal transport in the UK and Ireland.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Contemporary Evidence on Interhospital Neonatal Transport as a Potentially Sepsis-Relevant Care Interval: A Scoping Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Safely developing respiratory care during emergency neonatal transport through systematic collection and analysis of detailed ventilator data.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Observational
- Comparison of volume and non-volume ventilation modes on carbon dioxide following neonatal transport.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- Neonatal and Pediatric Transport: A Contemporary Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Infants requiring interhospital transfer for a higher level of care in the neonatal period are at increased risk of adverse outcomes. Optimising respiratory management is an important priority. The aim of this survey was to investigate current respiratory support strategies in neonatal transport and identify opportunities for the optimisation of clinical care and future research. A survey of all 18 transport groups in Ireland and the UK was performed. A 10-item structured questionnaire was administered through consultant neonatologists or lead nurses from each transport group between May and June 2024. There was a 100% response rate. There was variation in the types of neonatal ventilator used, and they differed from those on NICUs. A variety of invasive strategies were used, but volume-targeted ventilation was the most common, although different ventilators can deliver different volumes despite apparently the same settings. Non-invasive strategies were used by all, with humidified high flow nasal cannula (HHFNC) being the most common. Continuous carbon dioxide (CO
conclusionThere is heterogeneity in the ventilators and respiratory strategies used by transport groups. Future research opportunities should include the comparison of those strategies on short- and long-term outcomes, as well as whether continuous CO WHAT IS KNOWN: • Nearly one quarter of neonatal transfers in the UK and Ireland are in infants mechanically ventilated. • Optimising respiratory support strategies and reporting respiratory outcomes are research priorities in neonatal transport. WHAT IS NEW: • Volume targeted ventilation is the most common respiratory support strategy used in neonatal transport groups in the UK and Ireland, with a heterogeneity of ventilators in use in neonatal transport versus in NICUs. • There is a paucity of data reporting respiratory outcomes following neonatal transport including outcomes related to mode of ventilation, continuous carbon dioxide monitoring and closed loop automated oxygen control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.