Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39753735›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Explainable artificial intelligence with UNet based segmentation and Bayesian machine learning for classification of brain tumors using MRI images.

K Lakshmi, Sibi Amaran, G Subbulakshmi, S Padmini, Gyanenedra Prasad Joshi, Woong Cho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Multi-class brain tumor MRI segmentation and classification using deep learning and machine learning approaches.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

K LakshmiDepartment of Information Technology, Sri Manakula Vinayagar Engineering College, Madagadipet, Puducherry, India.
Sibi AmaranDepartment of Computing Technologies, School of Computing, College of Engineering and Technology, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, SRM Nagar, Kattankulathur, Chennai, 603203, India.
G SubbulakshmiDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Data Science, St. Joseph's College of Engineering and Technology, Elupatti, Thanjavur, India.
S PadminiDepartment of Computing Technologies, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, Chennai, 603203, India.
Gyanenedra Prasad JoshiDepartment of AI Software, Kangwon National University, Samcheok, Republic of Korea. joshi@kangwon.ac.kr.
Woong ChoDepartment of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineering, Kangwon National University, Samcheok, Republic of Korea. wcho@kangwon.ac.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detecting brain tumours (BT) early improves treatment possibilities and increases patient survival rates. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanning offers more comprehensive information, such as better contrast and clarity, than any alternative scanning process. Manually separating BTs from several MRI images gathered in medical practice for cancer analysis is challenging and time-consuming. Tumours and MRI scans of the brain are exposed utilizing methods and machine learning technologies, simplifying the process for doctors. MRI images can sometimes appear normal even when a patient has a tumour or malignancy. Deep learning approaches have recently depended on deep convolutional neural networks to analyze medical images with promising outcomes. It supports saving lives faster and rectifying some medical errors. With this motivation, this article presents a new explainable artificial intelligence with semantic segmentation and Bayesian machine learning for brain tumors (XAISS-BMLBT) technique. The presented XAISS-BMLBT technique mainly concentrates on the semantic segmentation and classification of BT in MRI images. The presented XAISS-BMLBT approach initially involves bilateral filtering-based image pre-processing to eliminate the noise. Next, the XAISS-BMLBT technique performs the MEDU-Net+ segmentation process to define the impacted brain regions. For the feature extraction process, the ResNet50 model is utilized. Furthermore, the Bayesian regularized artificial neural network (BRANN) model is used to identify the presence of BTs. Finally, an improved radial movement optimization model is employed for the hyperparameter tuning of the BRANN technique. To highlight the improved performance of the XAISS-BMLBT technique, a series of simulations were accomplished by utilizing a benchmark database. The experimental validation of the XAISS-BMLBT technique portrayed a superior accuracy value of 97.75% over existing models.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBayes TheoremBrain NeoplasmsMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingDeep LearningHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, ComputerBayesian machine learningBrain tumorsExplainable artificial intelligenceHyperparameter tuningSemantic segmentation

Identifiers

PMID39753735
PMCPMC11699199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.