Trial reportScientific reports2025
A randomized cohort study on the use of 3D printed models to enhance surgical training in suturing techniques.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A study comparing virtual reality simulation, 3D printed organ models and a combination of both for laparoscopy surgery skills acquisition.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Trial
- Printing the future of surgical education: a randomized trial of digital tools in cardiovascular training.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) printed surgical models provide an excellent surgical training option to closely mimic real operations to teach medical students who currently rely largely on visual learning aided with simple suturing pads. There is an unmet need to create simple to complex surgical training programs suitable for medical students. A prospective cohort study was conducted on a group of 16 6th year students. They were randomly divided into two groups for suture training on a basic training pad or on unique 3D-printed intestinal anastomosis models. After 4 weeks of open and laparoscopic surgical training, exams were performed on the standardized 3D-printed model at the end of each stage to assess surgical performance including surgical time and scores. Both groups had similar skills before the start of each stage. In stage 1, both groups showed comparable learning performance, but the 3D model group performed better in Exam 1. In stage 2, the 3D model group took more time but showed significant improvements and outperformed the pad group in Exam 2 in both performance scores and time. Post-training questionnaires indicated increased interest in surgery and technical training among students using 3D models. Realistic 3D-printed models benefit surgical training, expected to become integral in teaching operative skills and techniques to medical students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.