Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39753657›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Utilizing UAV and orthophoto data with bathymetric LiDAR in google earth engine for coastal cliff degradation assessment.

Paweł Tysiąc, Rafał Ossowski, Łukasz Janowski, Damian Moskalewicz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Paweł TysiącFaculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Gdańsk University of Technology, Gabriela Narutowicza 11/12, 80-233, Gdańsk, Poland. pawtysia@pg.edu.pl.
Rafał OssowskiFaculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Gdańsk University of Technology, Gabriela Narutowicza 11/12, 80-233, Gdańsk, Poland.
Łukasz JanowskiMaritime Institute, Gdynia Maritime University, Roberta de Plelo 20, 80-548, Gdańsk, Poland.
Damian MoskalewiczDepartment of Geomorphology and Quaternary Geology, Faculty of Oceanography and Geography, University of Gdańsk, Bażyńskiego 4, 80-952, Gdańsk, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study introduces a novel methodology for estimating and analysing coastal cliff degradation, using machine learning and remote sensing data. Degradation refers to both natural abrasive processes and damage to coastal reinforcement structures caused by natural events. We utilized orthophotos and LiDAR data in green and near-infrared wavelengths to identify zones impacted by storms and extreme weather events that initiated mass movement processes. Our approach included change detection analysis to estimate eroded areas. Next, by applying Random Forest classifier within Google Earth Engine, we evaluated the importance of features in detecting these degraded zones. We tested the algorithm's performance using datasets of varying resolutions (10 cm, 20 cm, 50 cm, and 100 cm), and a UAV dataset acquired two years later to validate results. The classifier achieved an overall accuracy of approximately 90% across all datasets. The findings indicate that DEM products in green and near-infrared wavelengths are similarly important, while reflectance maps and orthophotos suggest that red and near-infrared wavelengths play a significant role in identifying degradation. These results suggest that it is feasible to monitor coastal degradation caused by natural disasters using diverse sensors within a single training framework.

Indexed as

Airborne laser scanningCoastal zone degradationGEEMachine learningNatural disastersUAV

Identifiers

PMID39753657
PMCPMC11698861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.