Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39753636›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A non-metallic PEEK topology optimization reconstruction implant for large mandibular continuity defects, validated using the MANDYBILATOR apparatus.

Bram B J Merema, Frederik K L Spijkervet, Joep Kraeima, Max J H Witjes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bram B J MeremaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, P.O. Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands. b.j.merema@umcg.nl.
Frederik K L SpijkervetDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, P.O. Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Joep KraeimaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, P.O. Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Max J H WitjesDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, P.O. Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In cases of large mandibular continuity defects resulting from malignancy resection, the current standard of care involves using patient-specific/custom titanium reconstruction plates along with autogenous grafts (fibula, scapula, or iliac crest segments). However, when grafts are not feasible or desired, only the reconstruction plate is used to bridge the gap. Unfortunately, metal osteosynthesis and reconstruction plates, including titanium, exhibit adverse effects such as stress-shielding and limitations in accurate postoperative irradiation (especially with proton-beam therapy). To address these issues, in this study we explore, develop and validate a non-metallic solution: a topology-optimized polyetheretherketone (PEEK) load-bearing implant for large non-grafted mandibular continuity defects. In order to thoroughly validate the developed PEEK reconstruction, a dedicated MANDYBILATOR testing apparatus was developed. Using the MANDYBILATOR finite element analysis results of the implant were confirmed and the PEEK implant was mechanically validated for both static and dynamic loading. Results show that the PEEK reconstructed mandible is comparably strong as the unreconstructed mandible and is unlikely to fail due to fatigue. Our PEEK implant design has the mechanical potential to act as a substitute for the current titanium plates used in the reconstruction of continuity defects of the mandible. This may potentially lead to optimised patient-specific reconstructions, with the implants matching the bone's stiffness and possessing radiolucent properties which are useful for radiographic follow-ups and radiotherapy. Furthermore, the addition of the dynamic/cyclic MANDYBILATOR apparatus allows for more realistic application of the in-vivo loading of the mandible and can provide added insights in biomechanical behaviour of the mandible.

Indexed as

BenzophenonesKetonesMandiblePolyethylene GlycolsPolymersBone PlatesFinite Element AnalysisHumansMandibular ReconstructionMaterials TestingProstheses and ImplantsTitaniumBenzophenonesKetonespolyetheretherketonePolyethylene GlycolsPolymersTitanium

Identifiers

PMID39753636
PMCPMC11698898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.