ArticleScientific reports2025
Validity and reliability of the brief form of the normative male alexithymia scale among Chinese patients after radical prostatectomy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sense of community index scale: Translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of the Chinese version - a cross-sectional study.Medicine · 2026Article
- Designing, psychometric, and application of measurement instrument for Self-Care Literacy in Prevention of Prostate Cancer (SCL-PCa): A mixed-method study protocol.Journal of education and health promotion · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alexithymia, a cognitive and emotional deficit characterized by difficulty in expressing emotions and identifying feelings, poses significant challenges in healthcare settings. Developing a reliable and valid tool to measure alexithymia in post-prostatectomy patients would not only aid healthcare professionals in identifying at-risk individuals but also facilitate early intervention and targeted support. This study aimed to translate the Brief Form of the Normative Male Alexithymia Scale (NMAS-BF) into Simplified Chinese, evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version, and explore its influencing factors. The English version of the NMAS-BF was translated into Chinese according to Brislin's translation guidelines. A survey was administered to 430 patients who had undergone radical prostatectomy across four tertiary-grade A hospitals in China. To assess test-retest reliability, 30 patients completed the survey twice. Data analysis was performed using SPSS 26.0 and AMOS 22.0. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to evaluate the content validity, construct validity, reliability, and concurrent validity of the translated NMAS-BF. Additionally, Pearson's correlation, t-tests, and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to identify factors influencing the NMAS-BF. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the Chinese version of the NMAS-BF was 0.856. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) for the total scale was 0.938, indicating good stability. Content validity was satisfactory, with exploratory factor analysis revealing a single-factor model that accounted for 58.965% of the variance. Confirmatory factor analysis (χ²/df = 1.371, RMSEA = 0.041) demonstrated acceptable construct validity. Statistically significant differences in alexithymia levels were observed across patients with varying educational levels, family residence, household monthly income, and number of children. Perceived stress, mutuality, social impact, and self-esteem were identified as significant factors influencing alexithymia. This study initially translated the Brief Form of the Normative Male Alexithymia Scale (NMAS-BF) into Chinese and demonstrated its psychometric validity for assessing alexithymia in patients post-radical prostatectomy. By identifying alexithymic patterns and their contributing factors, the research aims to improve emotional expression and enhance the mental well-being of Chinese patients undergoing this procedure. Furthermore, the factors identified in the Chinese version of the NMAS-BF may provide valuable theoretical insights for future intervention studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.