Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39753589›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Analysis and prediction of condylar resorption following orthognathic surgery.

Pieter-Jan Verhelst, Sigrid Janssens, Harold Matthews, Giacomo Begnoni, Peter Claes, Eman Shaheen, Hilde Peeters, Constantinus Politis, Reinhilde Jacobs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Pieter-Jan VerhelstOMFS IMPATH Research Group, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Sigrid JanssensOMFS IMPATH Research Group, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Harold MatthewsDepartment of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Giacomo BegnoniOrthodontics Research Unit, Department of Oral Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Peter ClaesDepartment of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Eman ShaheenOMFS IMPATH Research Group, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Hilde PeetersDepartment of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Constantinus PolitisOMFS IMPATH Research Group, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Reinhilde JacobsOMFS IMPATH Research Group, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. reinhilde.jacobs@ki.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Condylar resorption is a feared complication of orthognathic surgery. This study investigated condylar resorption in a cohort of 200 patients This allowed for a powerful update on incidence and risk factors. 9.5% of patients developed resorption. These patients had on average, 17% volume loss with 3.9 mm ramal height loss and 3.1 mm posterior mandibular displacement. 2% of patients had bilateral resorption. Univariable analysis identified a younger age, a bimaxillary + genioplasty procedure, larger mandibular advancements, upward movements of the distal segment, a higher counterclockwise pitch of the distal segment, smaller preoperative condylar volumes and a higher anterior/posterior lower facial height ratio as risk factors on a patient level. Univariable analysis on a condylar level also identified compressive movements of the ramus and a higher mandibular plane angle as risk factors. Using machine learning for the multivariable analysis, the amount of mandibular advancement was the most important predictor for condylar resorption. There were no differences in preoperative mandibular, ramal or condylar shape between patients with or without resorption. These findings suggest condylar resorption may be more common than thought. Identifying risk factors allows surgical plans to be adjusted to reduce the likelihood of resorption, and patients can be more selectively screened postoperatively.

Indexed as

Bone ResorptionMandibular CondyleOrthognathic Surgical ProceduresAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleOrthognathic SurgeryPostoperative ComplicationsRisk FactorsYoung AdultBilateral sagittal split osteotomyCondylar remodelingCondylar resorptionOrthognathic surgeryTemporomandibular joint

Identifiers

PMID39753589
PMCPMC11699120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.