ArticleScientific reports2025
Deciphering antioxidant interactions via data mining and RDKit.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpretable Machine Learning Frameworks for QSAR Modeling: A Comparative Study of Classical Algorithms and Transformer-CNN Architectures.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Leakage-Aware Machine Learning and Deep Learning Benchmarking of Food Antioxidant Capacity Prediction on the Antioxidant Food Table.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Fortified Chestnut Honey Triggers Apoptosis in Colon Cancer Cells.Plant foods for human nutrition (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Minimizing the oxidation of lipids remains one of the most important challenges to extend the shelf-life of food products and reduce food waste. While most consumer products contain antioxidants, the most efficient strategy is to incorporate combinations of two or more compounds, boosting the total antioxidant capacity. Unfortunately, the reasons for observing synergistic / antagonistic / additive effects in food samples are still unclear, and it is common to observe very different responses even for similar mixtures. Aiming to identify chemical features that can be correlated with specific responses, this report presents an analysis of 1243 mixtures of antioxidants reported in the literature. The analysis focuses on the most commonly reported compounds and mixtures and considers how various chemical descriptors (number of atoms, number of heavy atoms, number of heteroatoms, number of carbon atoms, number of oxygen atoms, number of nitrogen atoms, number of chloride atoms, polar surface area, molecular weight, number of aromatic rings, logP, and hydrogen bond counts) affect the response. Out of those, our analysis showed that hydrogen bonding plays an important role in determining how antioxidants interact, potentially affecting the overall behavior of mixtures. Far from drawing a universal conclusion about one particular mechanism; this article provides an overview of what has worked so far, delving into the possible chemical variables behind those interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.