ArticleScientific data2025
Multi-Planar Cervical Motion Dataset: IMU Measurements and Goniometer.
Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Privacy-Preserving Head Pose Estimation System for Measuring Cervical Range of Motion.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Continuous Non-Invasive Assessment of Segmental Cervical Motion: A Narrative Review and Validation Framework.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Use of Technologies for the Acquisition and Processing Strategies for Motion Data Analysis.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Multi-Planar Cervical Motion Dataset: IMU Measurements and Goniometer.Scientific data · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This data descriptor presents a comprehensive and replicable dataset and method for calculating the cervical range of motion (CROM) utilizing quaternion-based orientation analysis from Delsys inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensors. This study was conducted with 14 participants and analyzed 504 cervical movements in the Sagittal, Frontal and Horizontal planes. Validated against a Universal Goniometer and tested for reliability and reproducibility. Analysis showed strong validity in the sagittal plane (R = 0.828 ± 0.051) and moderate in the frontal (R = 0.573 ± 0.138), with limitations in the horizontal plane (R = 0.353 ± 0.122). Reliability was high across all planes (Sagittal: ICC = 0.855 ± 0.065, Frontal: ICC = 0.855 ± 0.015, Horizontal: ICC = 0.945 ± 0.005). Our model for CROM measurements is a valuable tool aiding diagnosis, treatment planning, and monitoring of cervical spine conditions. This study presents an accessible analysis process for biomechanical assessments in cervical and spinal fields. The dataset herein serves as a benchmark for state-of-the-art machine learning models predicting head/neck position, analyzing smoothness of movements, measuring standard motion patterns, and calibrating drift based on movement comparisons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.