Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39753530›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Quantum-limited stochastic optical neural networks operating at a few quanta per activation.

Shi-Yuan Ma, Tianyu Wang, Jérémie Laydevant, Logan G Wright, Peter L McMahon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Stochastic reservoir computers.Nature communications · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shi-Yuan MaSchool of Applied and Engineering Physics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA. sm2725@cornell.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8299-6742
Tianyu WangSchool of Applied and Engineering Physics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6087-6376
Jérémie LaydevantSchool of Applied and Engineering Physics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Logan G WrightSchool of Applied and Engineering Physics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7696-1260
Peter L McMahonSchool of Applied and Engineering Physics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA. pmcmahon@cornell.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1177-9887

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Energy efficiency in computation is ultimately limited by noise, with quantum limits setting the fundamental noise floor. Analog physical neural networks hold promise for improved energy efficiency compared to digital electronic neural networks. However, they are typically operated in a relatively high-power regime so that the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is large (>10), and the noise can be treated as a perturbation. We study optical neural networks where all layers except the last are operated in the limit that each neuron can be activated by just a single photon, and as a result the noise on neuron activations is no longer merely perturbative. We show that by using a physics-based probabilistic model of the neuron activations in training, it is possible to perform accurate machine-learning inference in spite of the extremely high shot noise (SNR  ~ 1). We experimentally demonstrated MNIST handwritten-digit classification with a test accuracy of 98% using an optical neural network with a hidden layer operating in the single-photon regime; the optical energy used to perform the classification corresponds to just 0.038 photons per multiply-accumulate (MAC) operation. Our physics-aware stochastic training approach might also prove useful with non-optical ultra-low-power hardware.

Identifiers

PMID39753530
PMCPMC11698857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.