Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39753409›Full record

ReviewTrends in genetics : TIG2025

Genomic language models: opportunities and challenges.

Gonzalo Benegas, Chengzhong Ye, Carlos Albors, Jianan Canal Li, Yun S Song

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in genetics : TIG, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Novel genetic profile linked to cognitive decline in Hispanics/Latinos.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gonzalo BenegasComputer Science Division, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Chengzhong YeDepartment of Statistics, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Carlos AlborsComputer Science Division, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Jianan Canal LiComputer Science Division, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Yun S SongComputer Science Division, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA; Department of Statistics, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA; Center for Computational Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA. Electronic address: yss@berkeley.edu.

Funding

NIH HHS R35-GM134922
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) are having transformative impacts across a wide range of scientific fields, particularly in the biomedical sciences. Just as the goal of natural language processing is to understand sequences of words, a major objective in biology is to understand biological sequences. Genomic language models (gLMs), which are LLMs trained on DNA sequences, have the potential to significantly advance our understanding of genomes and how DNA elements at various scales interact to give rise to complex functions. To showcase this potential, we highlight key applications of gLMs, including functional constraint prediction, sequence design, and transfer learning. Despite notable recent progress, however, developing effective and efficient gLMs presents numerous challenges, especially for species with large, complex genomes. Here, we discuss major considerations for developing and evaluating gLMs.

Indexed as

GenomeGenomicsLanguageModels, GeneticNatural Language ProcessingAnimalsHumansgenomic language modelsmachine learningsequence designtransfer learningvariant effect prediction

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.