ArticleBJGP open2025
Personalised care planning for older people with frailty: a review of factors influencing implementation.
Article in BJGP open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFrailty increases vulnerability to major health changes because of seemingly small health problems. It affects around 10% of people aged >65 years. Older adults with frailty frequently have multiple long-term conditions, personal challenges, and social problems. Personalised care planning (PCP) based on 'goal setting' and 'action planning' is a promising way to address the needs of older adults living with frailty.
aimTo identify and explore factors that influence the implementation of PCP-style interventions for older adults. DESIGN &
settingWe conducted a scoping review and identified a small number of interventions that explicitly employed goal setting and action planning.
methodWe used a range of sources to identify relevant material. We included all interventions inclusive of patients aged ≥65 years and reported in English. We excluded end-of-life care interventions, group education, and/or those that did not involve one-to-one engagement. We explored all related articles that described, examined, or discussed implementation. We constructed a thematic framework in NVivo (version 11). Findings were narratively synthesised.
resultsWe identified 18 potentially relevant PCP-style interventions and 13 of these met the inclusion criteria. Within these, were seven main categories of potentially modifiable influences relevant to older adults with frailty related to the following: primary care engagement; delivery staff characteristics; training; patient engagement; collaborative working; organisation and management; and systems.
conclusionMany modifiable factors can influence the implementation of PCP. We identified several influences that have informed the development and implementation of a novel intervention PeRsOnaliSed care Planning for oldER people with frailty (PROSPER).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.