Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39753271›Full record

ArticleBMJ health & care informatics2025

Sharing data matters: exploring the attitudes of older consumers on an emerging healthy ageing data platform using electronic health records for research.

Kim Naude, David A Snowdon, Emily Parker, Roisin McNaney, Velandai Srikanth, Nadine E Andrew

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ health & care informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kim NaudeMonash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia kim.naude@monash.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2118-4729
David A SnowdonMonash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Emily ParkerMonash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Roisin McNaneyMonash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Velandai SrikanthMonash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Nadine E AndrewMonash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Australia, with the recent introduction of electronic health records (EHRs) into hospitals, the use of hospital-based EHRs for research is a relatively new concept. The aim of this study was to explore the attitudes of older healthcare consumers on sharing their health data with an emerging EHR-based Research Data Platform within the National Centre for Healthy Ageing.

methodsThis was a qualitative study. Two workshops were conducted in March 2022 with consumer representatives across Peninsula Health, Victoria, Australia. The workshops comprised three parts: (1) an ice-breaker (2) an introduction to EHR-based research through the presentation of 'use case' scenarios and (3) focus group discussions. Qualitative data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

resultsConsumer participants (n=16) were aged between 62 and 83 years and were of mixed gender. The overarching theme was related to trust in the use of EHR data for research; themes included: (1) benefits of sharing data, (2) uncertainty around data collection processes and (3) data sharing fears. The three themes within the overarching theme all reflect participants' levels of trust.

conclusionOur study identified fundamental issues related to trust in the use of EHR data for research, with both healthcare and broader societal factors contributing to consumer attitudes. Processes to support transparent and clear communication with consumers are essential to support the responsible use of EHR data for research.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsFocus GroupsInformation DisseminationQualitative ResearchAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHealthy AgingHumansMaleMiddle AgedTrustVictoriaElectronic Health RecordsHealth Services ResearchPublic Health

Identifiers

PMID39753271
PMCPMC11751950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.