Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39753266›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Patient-sharing networks among Finnish primary healthcare professionals taking care of patients with mental health or substance use problems: a register study.

Laura Hietapakka, Timo Sinervo, Visa Väisänen, Ripsa Niemi, Mai Gutvilig, Outi Linnaranta, Jaana Suvisaari, Christian Hakulinen, Marko Elovainio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Laura HietapakkaFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland laura.hietapakka@thl.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0169-4772
Timo SinervoFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4475-0797
Visa VäisänenFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-5738-8348
Ripsa NiemiFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-2055-170X
Mai GutviligFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-0534-9222
Outi LinnarantaFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Jaana SuvisaariFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7167-0990
Christian HakulinenFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Marko ElovainioFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1401-1910

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPatient-sharing networks based on administrative data are used to understand the organisation of healthcare. We examined the patient-sharing networks between different professionals taking care of patients with mental health or substance use problems.

designRegister study based on the Register of Primary Health Care visits (Avohilmo) that covers all outpatient primary health care visits in Finland.

settingWe used the register data covering the visits for the service providers of seven municipalities, adult patients with at least one visit to a health and social service centre within one of the municipalities and visits during the year 2021.

participantsWe first selected patients with mental health or substance use problems based on psychiatric diagnoses and information on service type and then identified the professionals (N=1566) visited. A patient-sharing relationship was defined between two professionals if a same patient had visited both of them at least once. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: We analysed the potential associations of the network structure and the nodal attributes (municipality, belonging to a certain occupational group and the service type) with nodal formation using Exponential Random Graph Models.

resultsThe main findings showed that two professionals were more likely to share patient(s) when they belonged to the same occupational group, provided similar types of services or worked in the same municipality. Being a physician was associated with having more connections to other professionals than belonging to other occupational groups (OR for nurses 0.70, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.7 and for other occupations 0.83, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.84). Shared patients among different professionals were also more probable when the patients were shared with the professionals working within mental health or substance use services compared with outpatient healthcare services (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.61 to 1.67).

conclusionsPatient-sharing contacts were mainly homogenous, supporting the tendency of people to have connections with similar people. The results also highlight the role of the physicians as important partners in the patient-sharing networks.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersPrimary Health CareRegistriesSubstance-Related DisordersAdultFemaleFinlandHealth PersonnelHumansMaleMiddle AgedHealth ServicesHealth WorkforcePrimary Health CareREGISTRIES

Identifiers

PMID39753266
PMCPMC11749436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.