ArticleBMJ open2025
Healthcare professionals face ethical challenges in managing care for neurodevelopmental disorders: a qualitative study in Lebanon.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to explore the ethical challenges faced by healthcare professionals (HCPs) in managing children and adolescents with neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) in Lebanon. The primary research question addressed how HCPs navigate ethical dilemmas related to patient autonomy, surrogate decision-making and communication in the context of severe cognitive impairments.
designQualitative, cross-sectional study using semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis was applied to identify key ethical challenges in clinical practice.
settingParticipants recruited from a range of healthcare specialties, including paediatric neurology, general paediatrics and psychiatry, and registered with the Lebanese Order of Physicians.
participantsSixteen HCPs, including paediatric neurologists and psychiatrists, participated in the study. Participants were selected based on their experience in treating children and adolescents with NDDs. There were no exclusion criteria based on gender, ethnicity or years of experience.
interventionsNo formal interventions were applied. Participants were interviewed about their experiences and ethical challenges in managing patients with NDD. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the identification of ethical dilemmas faced by HCPs in clinical decision-making with patients with NDD. Secondary outcomes included insights into the strategies employed by HCPs to balance patient autonomy with surrogate decision-making and the communication challenges they face with patients' families.
resultsThematic analysis revealed several key ethical challenges, including (1) balancing patient autonomy with the need for surrogate decision-making, (2) tailoring healthcare to individual cognitive abilities and (3) navigating the complexities of communication with patients and their families. Participants emphasised the importance of assessing decision-making capacity on a case-by-case basis. The study also highlighted the need for specialised, patient-centred approaches that respect autonomy while considering the practical limitations imposed by severe cognitive impairments.
conclusionsThis study provides critical insights into the ethical considerations faced by HCPs in managing children and adolescents with NDDs. Further research is needed to develop training programs for HCPs that address these ethical challenges and promote patient-centred decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.