Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39753252›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Poly-skilling and advanced practice roles in perioperative care: protocol for a realist synthesis of evidence.

Carolina Britton, David Walker, Ann Griffin, Della Freeth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Carolina BrittonFaculty of Medical Sciences, University College London, London, UK carolina.britton@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4280-3894
David WalkerFaculty of Medical Sciences, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1198-3308
Ann GriffinFaculty of Medical Sciences, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7723-7589
Della FreethFaculty of Medical Sciences, University College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAn ageing population and a workforce crisis have triggered an ambitious UK strategy for sustained delivery of healthcare. In perioperative care (the management of patients from contemplation of surgery until full recovery), it is recognised that interventions are needed to place the workforce on a more sustainable footing through cross-functionality and skill-shifting, namely with advanced practice roles. However, despite some reports and reviews in the literature, it is unclear how skills development efforts may potentially support workforce transformation for an effective and resilient perioperative care workforce. Thus, drawing causal inferences for policy-making that is both evidence based and rooted in theory is challenging. A scoping review, reported within this protocol, confirmed that 'poly-skilling' and 'advanced practice roles' are critical to this workforce transformation, but the mechanisms through which interventions in this area may work are not understood. A synthesis of evidence is, therefore, proposed in this protocol, to understand what works for whom and under what circumstances, in relation to poly-skilling and advanced practice roles in workforce transformation for sustained healthcare delivery. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol sets out the plan to undertake a realist synthesis of the related literature, with theory elicitation (step 1), search for empirical evidence (step 2), selection and appraisal of evidence (step 3) and programme theory refinement (step 4). Exploratory reviews of the literature and key informants' inputs will produce initial hypotheses as to what it is about interventions in poly-skilling and advanced practice roles that work and why. Data from the literature will then be collected based on relevance, rigour and richness. The iterative analysis and synthesis of these data will produce causal links between contexts, mechanisms and outcomes. The results will inform a realist evaluation, to be undertaken as part of doctoral research, to better understand the mechanisms that support workforce transformation through poly-skilling and advanced practice roles. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: As a review of previously published literature, the evidence synthesis proposed in this protocol does not require formal ethical approval. Recommended ethical considerations regarding the involvement of key informants, who are not study participants but a consultative group, are presented in this protocol. A formal ethics approval will be sought ahead of the later empirical stage of the research. The results of the realist synthesis proposed in this protocol will be fed back to the local National Health Service organisation and Integrated Care Board and disseminated to the research community via presentations at conferences and a peer-reviewed journal article. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024512164.

Indexed as

Perioperative CareClinical CompetenceHumansResearch DesignUnited KingdomEducation, MedicalHealth ServicesHealth Workforce

Identifiers

PMID39753252
PMCPMC11749317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.