Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39753245›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

IMPACT-ICU feasibility study: pragmatic mixed-methods randomised controlled trial of a follow-up care intervention for survivors of critical illness and caregivers.

Natasha Arianne Jawa, David M Maslove, Stephanie Sibley, John Muscedere, Miranda Hunt, Michaela Hanley, Tracy Boyd, Robin Westphal, Sunita Mathur, Afolasade Fakolade and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06681649 (Improving Medical and Psychological Outcomes After Discharge - Feasibility Study for a Pragmatic, Mixed-methods, Open-label Randomized Controlled Trial Examining the Effectiveness of a Follow-up Clinic for ICU Survivors and Caregivers), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06681649 narecruitingnot on this map

Improving Medical and Psychological Outcomes After Discharge - Feasibility Study for a Pragmatic, Mixed-methods, Open-label Randomized Controlled Trial Examining the Effectiveness of a Follow-up Clinic for ICU Survivors and Caregivers

TypeinterventionalSponsorQueen's UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled40ConditionsCritical Illness, Delirium in the Intensive Care UnitArmsIntervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Natasha Arianne JawaCentre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada tasha.jawa@queensu.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7600-7178
David M MasloveMedicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Stephanie SibleyCritical Care Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
John MuscedereMedicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9027-7198
Miranda HuntCritical Care Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Michaela HanleyCritical Care Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Tracy BoydCritical Care Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Robin WestphalCritical Care Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Sunita MathurSchool of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Afolasade FakoladeSchool of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Michelle TryonCritical Care Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
John Gordon BoydCentre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSurvivors of critical illness and their caregivers are at risk for long-term cognitive, physical and psychiatric impairments known as post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) and PICS-family, respectively. This study will assess the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) evaluating an intensive care unit (ICU) follow-up care bundle versus standard-of-care for ICU patients and their caregivers. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a single-centre feasibility study. Survivors of critical illness will be eligible if: age ≥18 years, life expectancy ≥6 months and high risk for PICS. We define high risk as ICU stay ≥4 days or involving 1+ of mechanical ventilation, tracheostomy, delirium or lack of access to a primary care physician (PCP). 20 ICU survivor-primary caregiver dyads will be enrolled (n=10 dyads per group) and randomised 1:1 to the intervention versus control group. The intervention will be: (1) diaries to journal patient experiences, (2) information packages on expectations post-discharge and (3) specialised follow-up care at 1 and 3 months post-discharge. The control group will receive standard of care in the ICU and follow-up with their PCP. The primary outcome is feasibility, defined as: (1) consent rate >80%, (2) enrolment rate of 4 participants/month, (3) follow-up rate>70% and (4) data capture rate >80%. Our secondary objective is to explore the perspectives of survivors of critical illness and their families about the intervention and their participation in the study. Tertiary outcomes will be a battery of cognitive, physical functioning and psychiatric outcomes. IMPLICATIONS: Survivorship from critical illness extends beyond surviving an ICU stay. This project will lay the foundation for performing a large, multicentre pragmatic RCT with survivors of critical illness and their caregivers, paving the way for improved long-term healthcare. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has received approval (6039808) from the Queen's University Health Sciences/Affiliated Teaching Hospitals Research Ethics Board. Results will be presented at critical care conferences. A lay summary co-designed with ICU survivor participants will be provided to patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06681649.

Indexed as

CaregiversCritical IllnessFeasibility StudiesIntensive Care UnitsSurvivorsAftercareCritical CareHumansPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAdult intensive & critical careCaregiver BurdenCognitionFeasibility Studies

Identifiers

PMID39753245
PMCPMC11749798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.