Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39753243›Full record

ArticleBMJ open quality2025

Prehospital video triage of suspected stroke patients in Greater Manchester: pilot project report.

Ibrahim Alghamdi, Lisa Brunton, Christopher Ashton, David A Jenkins, Adrian R Parry-Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open quality, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. LiVE-STROKE: live video from bystander to the medical dispatcher in potential stroke cases.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ibrahim AlghamdiDivision of Cardiovascular Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK ibrahim.alghamdi-2@postgrad.manchester.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-9695-8549
Lisa BruntonSchool of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester Division of Population Health Health Services Research and Primary Care, Manchester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0464-6557
Christopher AshtonGreater Manchester Neurorehabilitation & Integrated Stroke Delivery Network, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1798-9041
David A JenkinsDivision of Informatics Imaging and Data Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Adrian R Parry-JonesDivision of Cardiovascular Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4462-3846

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionStroke is a leading cause of mortality and morbidity, demanding prompt and accurate identification. However, prehospital diagnosis is challenging, with up to 50% of suspected strokes having other diagnoses. A prehospital video triage (PHVT) system was piloted in Greater Manchester to improve prehospital diagnostic accuracy and appropriate conveyance decisions.

methodA service evaluation of a PHVT pilot was conducted to assess PHVT efficacy and identify facilitators and barriers. The pilot (October-December 2022) was a collaboration between the North West Ambulance Service, Greater Manchester Neurorehabilitation and Integrated Stroke Delivery Network and stroke clinicians at Salford Royal Hospital. The service evaluation was mixed methods, including qualitative semistructured interviews with stroke clinicians, paramedics and patients (and/or caregivers). Interviews were analysed using a thematic approach.

resultsOut of 46 PHVT calls during the pilot, eight (18%) were diverted to local emergency department, 1 (2%) was left at their usual residence and 37 (80%) were transported to Salford Royal Hospital. Final diagnosis for PHVT patients was stroke in 15 (33%) of cases, non-stroke in 20 (43%) and transient ischaemic attack in 11 (24%).Patients/caregivers found PHVT beneficial in directing them to appropriate hospitals and streamlining admission and treatment. However, some reported delays as a result. Clinicians expressed mixed opinions regarding PHVT's utility. Paramedics found PHVT improved confidence in managing stroke patients. Hospital clinicians believed it provided valuable prearrival patient information, enhancing preparation. Others found PHVT less effective due to on-scene delays, challenges conducting comprehensive assessments over video and inability to identify all non-stroke cases.

conclusionPHVT was viewed favourably by most patients for enhancing the care quality. Paramedics and hospital clinicians acknowledge PHVT's support in making appropriate conveyance decisions and improving the preparation process before the patient's arrival. Participants, however, suggested prearrival registration, 24-hour availability and clinicians' buy-in for a more effective future rollout.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical ServicesStrokeTriageFemaleHumansMalePilot ProjectsQualitative ResearchVideo RecordingPrehospital careQuality improvementTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID39753243
PMCPMC11751970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.