Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39753218›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2024

Slit Lamp Report Generation and Question Answering: Development and Validation of a Multimodal Transformer Model with Large Language Model Integration.

Ziwei Zhao, Weiyi Zhang, Xiaolan Chen, Fan Song, James Gunasegaram, Wenyong Huang, Danli Shi, Mingguang He, Na Liu

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ziwei Zhao *School of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0009-0008-4551-348X
Weiyi Zhang *School of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0009-0008-2780-9121
Xiaolan ChenSchool of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1581-5045
Fan SongSchool of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8134-2402
James GunasegaramMonash University, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5517-986X
Wenyong HuangZhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4894-0937
Danli Shi *School of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6094-137X
Mingguang He *School of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6912-2810
Na Liu *Guangzhou Cadre and Talent Health Management Center, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0009-0008-4492-229X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLarge language models have shown remarkable efficacy in various medical research and clinical applications. However, their skills in medical image recognition and subsequent report generation or question answering (QA) remain limited.

objectiveWe aim to finetune a multimodal, transformer-based model for generating medical reports from slit lamp images and develop a QA system using Llama2. We term this entire process slit lamp-GPT.

methodsOur research used a dataset of 25,051 slit lamp images from 3409 participants, paired with their corresponding physician-created medical reports. We used these data, split into training, validation, and test sets, to finetune the Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training framework toward report generation. The generated text reports and human-posed questions were then input into Llama2 for subsequent QA. We evaluated performance using qualitative metrics (including BLEU [bilingual evaluation understudy], CIDEr [consensus-based image description evaluation], ROUGE-L [Recall-Oriented Understudy for Gisting Evaluation-Longest Common Subsequence], SPICE [Semantic Propositional Image Caption Evaluation], accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, and F

resultsWe identified 50 conditions related to diseases or postoperative complications through keyword matching in initial reports. The refined slit lamp-GPT model demonstrated BLEU scores (1-4) of 0.67, 0.66, 0.65, and 0.65, respectively, with a CIDEr score of 3.24, a ROUGE (Recall-Oriented Understudy for Gisting Evaluation) score of 0.61, and a Semantic Propositional Image Caption Evaluation score of 0.37. The most frequently identified conditions were cataracts (22.95%), age-related cataracts (22.03%), and conjunctival concretion (13.13%). Disease classification metrics demonstrated an overall accuracy of 0.82 and an F

conclusionsThis study introduces the slit lamp-GPT model for report generation and subsequent QA, highlighting the potential of large language models to assist ophthalmologists and patients.

Indexed as

Slit Lamp MicroscopyHumansLanguagelarge language modelmedical report generationquestion answeringslit lamp

Identifiers

PMID39753218
PMCPMC11729784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.