ArticleJMIR formative research2024
Allied Health Professionals' Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence in the Clinical Setting: Cross-Sectional Survey.
Article in JMIR formative research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence, Career Engagement, and Intrinsic Motivation Among Healthcare Workers in Türkiye: A Cross-Sectional Study of Indirect Associations.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Between Awareness and Readiness: Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence Among Indonesian Mental Health Professionals.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Acceptance and Use of Generative AI in Clinical Rehabilitation: An Interdisciplinary Survey of US Rehabilitation Professionals.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2026Article
- Receptiveness of physicians towards artificial intelligence-driven drug prescription: a nationwide survey.npj health systems · 2026Article
- Occupational therapists' perceptions of artificial intelligence: Potential, preparedness, and training needs.Australian occupational therapy journal · 2026Article
- Article
- Hearing health professionals' attitudes and perceived skills toward artificial intelligence.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Attitudes, perceptions, and factors influencing the adoption of artificial intelligence Among healthcare professionals in Saudi Arabia: a UTAUT-based study.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- What drives career choice in allied health professions in England? Insights from a national questionnaire.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Exercise Prescription in Palliative Care: Perceptions and Ethical Issues.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Perceived worries in the adoption of artificial intelligence among nurses in neonatal intensive care units.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Promises and perils of generative artificial intelligence: a narrative review informing its ethical and practical applications in clinical exercise physiology.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2025Review
- Assessing Artificial Intelligence Literacy: What do Health Information Professionals Know about AI?Advances in health information science and practice · 2025Article
- Understanding Generative Artificial Intelligence Adoption in Puerto Rican Medical Schools: A Cross-Institutional Survey of First- and Second-Year Students.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
- Article
- Overcoming barriers and enabling artificial intelligence adoption in allied health clinical practice: A qualitative study.Digital healthArticle
- Artificial intelligence in Malaysian health practice: Perspectives from allied health professionals.Digital healthArticle
- Allied health professional attitudes toward artificial intelligence in healthcare: A UK cross-sectional survey.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to address growing logistical and economic pressures on the health care system by reducing risk, increasing productivity, and improving patient safety; however, implementing digital health technologies can be disruptive. Workforce perception is a powerful indicator of technology use and acceptance, however, there is little research available on the perceptions of allied health professionals (AHPs) toward AI in health care.
objectiveThis study aimed to explore AHP perceptions of AI and the opportunities and challenges for its use in health care delivery.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted at a health service in, Queensland, Australia, using the Shinners Artificial Intelligence Perception tool.
resultsA total of 231 (22.1%) participants from 11 AHPs responded to the survey. Participants were mostly younger than 40 years (157/231, 67.9%), female (189/231, 81.8%), working in a clinical role (196/231, 84.8%) with a median of 10 years' experience in their profession. Most participants had not used AI (185/231, 80.1%), had little to no knowledge about AI (201/231, 87%), and reported workforce knowledge and skill as the greatest challenges to incorporating AI in health care (178/231, 77.1%). Age (P=.01), profession (P=.009), and AI knowledge (P=.02) were strong predictors of the perceived professional impact of AI. AHPs generally felt unprepared for the implementation of AI in health care, with concerns about a lack of workforce knowledge on AI and losing valued tasks to AI. Prior use of AI (P=.02) and years of experience as a health care professional (P=.02) were significant predictors of perceived preparedness for AI. Most participants had not received education on AI (190/231, 82.3%) and desired training (170/231, 73.6%) and believed AI would improve health care. Ideas and opportunities suggested for the use of AI within the allied health setting were predominantly nonclinical, administrative, and to support patient assessment tasks, with a view to improving efficiencies and increasing clinical time for direct patient care.
conclusionsEducation and experience with AI are needed in health care to support its implementation across allied health, the second largest workforce in health. Industry and academic partnerships with clinicians should not be limited to AHPs with high AI literacy as clinicians across all knowledge levels can identify many opportunities for AI in health care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.