ArticleHuman factors2025
Biodynamic Modeling and Analysis of Human-Exoskeleton Interactions in Simulated Patient Handling Tasks.
Article in Human factors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectiveTo investigate the biodynamics of human-exoskeleton interactions during patient handling tasks using a subject-specific modeling approach.BackgroundExoskeleton technology holds promise for mitigating musculoskeletal disorders caused by manual handling and most alarmingly by patient handling jobs. A deeper, more unified understanding of the biomechanical effects of exoskeleton use calls for advanced subject-specific models of complex, dynamic human-exoskeleton interactions.MethodsTwelve sex-balanced healthy participants performed three simulated patient handling tasks along with a reference load-lifting task, with and without wearing the exoskeleton, while their full-body motion and ground reaction forces were measured. Subject-specific models were constructed using motion and force data. Biodynamic response variables derived from the models were analyzed to examine the effects of the exoskeleton. Model validation used load-lifting trials with known hand forces.ResultsThe use of exoskeleton significantly reduced (19.7%-27.2%) the peak lumbar flexion moment but increased (26.4%-47.8%) the peak lumbar flexion motion, with greater moment percent reduction in more symmetric handling tasks; similarly affected the shoulder joint moments and motions but only during two more symmetric handling tasks; and significantly reduced the peak motions for the rest of the body joints.ConclusionSubject-specific biodynamic models simulating exoskeleton-assisted patient handling were constructed and validated, demonstrating that the exoskeleton effectively lessened the peak loading to the lumbar and shoulder joints as prime movers while redistributing more motions to these joints and less to the remaining joints.ApplicationThe findings offer new insights into biodynamic responses during exoskeleton-assisted patient handling, benefiting the development of more effective, possibly task- and individual-customized, exoskeletons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.