Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39752999›Full record

ArticleJournal of photochemistry and photobiology. B, Biology2025

Photodynamic antimicrobial therapy with Erythrosin B, Eosin Y, and Rose Bengal for the inhibition of fungal keratitis isolates: An in vitro study.

Brandon Chou, Katherine Krishna, Heather Durkee, Felipe Echeverri Tribin, Anam Ahmed, James Lai, Mariela C Aguilar, Braulio C L B Ferreira, Roger M Leblanc, Harry W Flynn and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of photochemistry and photobiology. B, Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Brandon ChouOphthalmic Biophysics Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States of America.
Katherine KrishnaOphthalmic Biophysics Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States of America.
Heather DurkeeOphthalmic Biophysics Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States of America. Electronic address: hdurkee@med.miami.edu.
Felipe Echeverri TribinOphthalmic Biophysics Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States of America.
Anam AhmedOphthalmic Biophysics Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States of America.
James LaiOphthalmic Biophysics Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States of America.
Mariela C AguilarOphthalmic Biophysics Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States of America.
Braulio C L B FerreiraOphthalmic Biophysics Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States of America; Department of Chemistry, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, United States of America.
Roger M LeblancDepartment of Chemistry, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, United States of America.
Harry W FlynnOphthalmic Biophysics Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States of America; Anne Bates Leach Eye Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States of America; Ocular Microbiology Laboratory, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States of America.
Guillermo AmescuaOphthalmic Biophysics Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States of America; Anne Bates Leach Eye Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States of America; Ocular Microbiology Laboratory, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States of America.
Jean-Marie ParelOphthalmic Biophysics Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States of America; Anne Bates Leach Eye Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States of America.
Darlene MillerAnne Bates Leach Eye Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States of America; Ocular Microbiology Laboratory, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States of America.

Funding

Shared Equipment ModuleP30EY014801 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Dmitry V Ivanov · 2004 to 2026
$12.2M
NEI NIH HHS L30 EY030689NEI NIH HHS L30 EY033162NEI NIH HHS P30 EY014801
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFungal keratitis is a leading cause of corneal blindness, with current antifungal treatments having limited efficacy. One promising treatment modality is Rose Bengal (RB) photodynamic antimicrobial therapy (PDAT) that has shown mixed success against fungal keratitis. Therefore, there is a need to explore the antimicrobial efficacy of other green-light activated photosensitizers that have deep penetration in the cornea to combat the deep fungal infections, such as Erythrosin B (EB) and Eosin Y (EY).

objectiveThis study will explore PDAT inhibitory effects with different photosensitizers, RB, EB, and EY against two common fungal ocular isolates, Aspergillus spp. and Fusarium spp.

methodsTwelve fungal isolates (Fusarium spp., n = 6, Aspergillus spp., n = 6) were prepared in suspension for evaluation of growth inhibition to PDAT with three photosensitizers, EB, EY, and RB. Custom green light source (λ = 518 nm, energy density = 5.4 J/cm

resultsAll twelve fungal isolates showed no inhibition to EB, EY, and RB without irradiation. Fusarium spp. were more susceptible to PDAT than Aspergillus spp. In all Fusarium solani strains, all photosensitizers with light showed full inhibition within the 47 mm diameter irradiation zone.

conclusionEB, EY, and RB PDAT demonstrated comparable antifungal inhibition against six Fusarium ocular isolates; these findings in conjunction with the deeper tissue penetration of EB and EY, are of interest to treat more advanced and deeper cases of fungal keratitis.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsEosine Yellowish-(YS)ErythrosineKeratitisPhotochemotherapyPhotosensitizing AgentsRose BengalAspergillusEye Infections, FungalFusariumHumansLightMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAntifungal AgentsEosine Yellowish-(YS)ErythrosinePhotosensitizing AgentsRose BengalAntifungalCorneal infectionsEosin YErythrosin BFilamentous fungusFungal keratitisPhotodynamic therapyRose Bengal

Identifiers

PMID39752999
PMCPMC12320518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.