Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39752644›Full record

Trial reportJournal of medical Internet research2025

Recruitment of Young Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex With Men for a Web-Based Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Intervention: Differences in Participant Characteristics and Study Engagement by Recruitment Source in a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Daniel J Marshall, Amy L Gower, Mira L Katz, José A Bauermeister, Abigail B Shoben, Paul L Reiter

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04032106 (A Randomized Controlled Trial of an HPV Vaccine Intervention for Young Sexual Minority Men), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04032106 nacompletednot on this map

A Randomized Controlled Trial of an HPV Vaccine Intervention for Young Sexual Minority Men

TypeinterventionalSponsorOhio State University Comprehensive Cancer CenterRan2019 to 2022Enrolled1,227ConditionsHealthy SubjectArmsBest Practice, Informational Intervention, Questionnaire Administration, Text Message-Based Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniel J MarshallCollege of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0823-6321
Amy L GowerDivision of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Health, Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9852-9196
Mira L KatzCollege of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9791-7592
José A BauermeisterDepartment of Family and Community Health, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9276-2306
Abigail B ShobenCollege of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9347-4755
Paul L ReiterCollege of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8252-2600

Funding

XenograftP30CA046592 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Eric R. Fearon · 1988 to 2026
$178.2M
Translational Therapeutics Research Program (TT)P30CA016058 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Daniel G. Stover · 1985 to 2026
$132.3M
A Randomized Controlled Trial of an HPV Vaccine Intervention for Young Sexual Minority MenR37CA226682 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI REITER, PAUL L · 2018 to 2023
$3.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016058NCI NIH HHS P30 CA046592NCI NIH HHS R37 CA226682
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundYoung gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men have been referred to as a "hard-to-reach" or "hidden" community in terms of recruiting for research studies. With widespread internet use among this group and young adults in general, web-based avenues represent an important approach for reaching and recruiting members of this community. However, little is known about how participants recruited from various web-based sources may differ from one another.

objectiveThis study aimed to determine how young gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men recruited from various web-based sources differ from one another in terms of participant characteristics and study engagement.

methodsData were collected as part of a randomized controlled trial of Outsmart HPV, a web-based human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination intervention for young gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men. From 2019 to 2021, we recruited young gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men in the United States who were aged 18-25 years and not vaccinated against HPV (n=1227) through various web-based avenues. We classified each participant as being recruited from either (1) social media (eg, Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat), (2) a dating app (eg, Grindr, Scruff), or (3) some other digital recruitment source (eg, existing research panel, university-based organization). Analyses compared participants from these 3 groups on demographic and health-related characteristics and metrics involving study engagement.

resultsMost demographic and health-related characteristics differed by web-based recruitment source, including race or ethnicity (P<.001), relationship status (P<.001), education level (P<.001), employment status (P<.001), sexual self-identity (P<.001), health insurance status (P<.001), disclosure of sexual orientation (P=.048), and connectedness to the LGBTQ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer) community (P<.001) The type of device used by participants during study enrollment also differed across groups, with smartphone use higher among participants recruited via dating apps (n=660, 96.6%) compared to those recruited via social media (n=318, 78.9%) or other digital sources (n=85, 60.3%; P<.001). Participants recruited via social media were more likely than those recruited via dating apps to complete follow-up surveys at 3 different timepoints (odds ratios 1.52-2.09, P=.001-.008). These participants also spent a longer amount of time viewing intervention content about HPV vaccination (3.14 minutes vs 2.67 minutes; P=.02).

conclusionsWe were able to recruit a large national sample of young gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men for a web-based HPV vaccination intervention via multiple methodologies. Participants differed on a range of demographic and health-related characteristics, as well as metrics related to study engagement, based on whether they were recruited from social media, a dating app, or some other digital recruitment source. Findings highlight key issues and considerations that can help researchers better plan and customize future web-based recruitment efforts of young gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04032106; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04032106. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/16294.

Indexed as

Homosexuality, MaleInternetPapillomavirus VaccinesSexual and Gender MinoritiesAdolescentAdultBisexualityHuman Papillomavirus VirusesHumansMalePapillomavirus InfectionsPatient SelectionSocial MediaVaccinationYoung AdultPapillomavirus Vaccinesadolescentsbisexualdating appsdigital interventiongaygay and bisexual menhuman papillomavirusmen who have sex with menrecruitmentsocial mediastudy recruitmentvaccination promotionyoung adults

Identifiers

PMID39752644
PMCPMC11748433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.