ArticleThe Journal of forensic odonto-stomatology2024
Third molar maturity index for discriminating between adults and minors: validation in an Iranian sample.
Article in The Journal of forensic odonto-stomatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Validation of Cameriere's third molar maturity index (I3M) for forensic age estimation in a Moroccan population: a cross-sectional study.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The life-altering effects of criminal trials necessitate providing reliable methods to distinguish adults (≥18) from minors (< 18). The present study aims to evaluate the accuracy of the third molar maturity index (I3M) introduced by Cameriere et al. (2008) in distinguishing adults from minors in the Iranian population. Panoramic radiographs of 800 Iranian individuals (400 males and 400 females) aged 14-23 were evaluated. The cut-off value of I3M=0.08 was analysed to determine whether the individual is younger or older than 18. All male or female subjects with I3M above 0.7 were below 18 years old. The cut-off value of 0.08 showed a sensitivity of 80.83% and 63.33% and a specificity of 88.12% and 93.12%, respectively, in males and females. The positive predictive values were 91.08% and 93.25%, and the negative predictive values were 75.40% and 62.87%, respectively, for males and females. The Bayes' post-test probability was 94% for females and 92% for males. 83.75% of males and 75.25% of females correctly classified as adults or minors. The most remarkable error rate occurred at 18 years old (67.5 % in females and 57.5% in males). By ROC curve analysis, the population-specific cut-off values of I3M 0.097 for males, 0.116 for females, and 0.099 regardless of sex, were acquired, which improved the sensitivity of discrimination between adults and minors (86.3%, 73.8%, and 78.1 %, respectively). The results showed that I3M is a reliable method for distinguishing between minors and adults in the Iranian population. This method provides a higher accuracy level in identifying individuals under 18 years old. Population-specific I3M cut-off values increased accuracy, sensitivity, and NPV, especially for females. The I3M method produced better results in diagnosing adult males than adult females and a higher accuracy level in identifying individuals under 18.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.