ArticlePloS one2025
Magnitude of telemedicine utilization and associated factors among health professionals working at selected public hospitals in Southern Ethiopia.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite the immense potential of telemedicine, its implementation in Ethiopia and other developing nations has faced formidable challenges, leading to disappointingly low utilization rates. Therefore, this study sought to assess the magnitude and factors associated with telemedicine service practice among healthcare professionals in the pilot public hospitals of Sidama and Southern Nations Nationalities Peoples Regions.
methodsCross-sectional study was conducted from June 1-30, 2021 among randomly selected 407 health professionals working at Pilot Hospitals in Southern Ethiopia. A pretested and structured self-administered questionnaire was used to collect the socio-demographic, knowledge and attitude of Health Professionals towards telemedicine and health system-related data. Data were coded and entered using Epi-data version 4.6. and exported to SPSS version 20 for analysis. Bi-variable and multivariable binary logistic regression was done to identify factors associated with telemedicine utilization. A P-value<0.05 and Adjusted odds ratio (AOR) together with 95% Confidence Interval (CI) was used to declare statistical significance. The data were presented by tables, text and figures and charts.
resultsThe study found that 34.6% (95% CI: 30-39.6%), 54.1% (95% CI: 49.6-59.2%), and 26% (95% CI: 21.6-30.2%) of the respondents have good knowledge, a positive attitude, and practiced telemedicine service, respectively. Age ≥ 36 years (AOR = 2.99, 95% CI: 1.18-7.60), being a medical doctor (AOR = 3.91, 95% CI 1.15-13.25), having good knowledge (AOR = 2.75, 95% CI 1.54-4.89), presence of an information sharing culture (AOR = 3.95, 95% CI 1.16-13.45), presence of a practicing platform (AOR = 3.01, 95% CI 1.06-8.53), and presence of government commitment (AOR = 2.52, 95% CI 1.09-5.82) were found to be significantly associated with telemedicine service utilization.
conclusionDespite positive attitudes, the adoption of telemedicine among healthcare professionals in the study area remains limited. Factors such as age, profession, knowledge, and cultural factors influence its uptake. To promote wider adoption and address challenges, governments should: implement comprehensive guidelines, training programs, and platforms for healthcare professionals to effectively utilize telemedicine technologies can accelerate healthcare delivery in the study area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.