ArticlePloS one2025
Automated CAD system for early detection and classification of pancreatic cancer using deep learning model.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Deep learning models for pancreatic cancer detection on CT: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Maximizing pancreatic carcinoma classification performance using parrot optimized vision transformer.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Pancreatic tumor detection in computed tomography images through a rotary positional siamese vision transformer.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Explainable Lightweight Model Using Low-Rank and Convolutional Block Attention for Pancreatic Cancer Diagnosis.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2026Article
- Machine learning in cancer imaging for enhanced precision in diagnosis and therapy.Discover computing · 2026Review
- Dual-database Bibliometric Analysis Combined with Gephi-based Network Visualization of Artificial Intelligence Applications in the Identification and Diagnosis of Thyroid Space-occupying Lesions.Current medical imaging · 2026Article
- Optimized federated learning framework with RegNetZ and Swin-Transformer for multimodal pancreatic cancer detection1.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence for the Diagnosis and Management of Cancers: Potentials and Challenges.MedComm · 2025Review
- Advancements in fusion-based deep representation learning for enhanced cervical precancerous lesion classification using biomedical image analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Deep learning automatic segmentation and radiomics model for diagnosing pancreatic solid neoplasms in MRI.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Advancements in the diagnosis of biliopancreatic diseases: A comparative review and study on future insights.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate diagnosis of pancreatic cancer using CT scan images is critical for early detection and treatment, potentially saving numerous lives globally. Manual identification of pancreatic tumors by radiologists is challenging and time-consuming due to the complex nature of CT scan images and variations in tumor shape, size, and location of the pancreatic tumor also make it challenging to detect and classify different types of tumors. Thus, to address this challenge we proposed a four-stage framework of computer-aided diagnosis systems. In the preprocessing stage, the input image resizes into 227 × 227 dimensions then converts the RGB image into a grayscale image, and enhances the image by removing noise without blurring edges by applying anisotropic diffusion filtering. In the segmentation stage, the preprocessed grayscale image a binary image is created based on a threshold, highlighting the edges by Sobel filtering, and watershed segmentation to segment the tumor region and we also implement the U-Net method for segmentation. Then refine the geometric structure of the image using morphological operation and extracting the texture features from the image using a gray-level co-occurrence matrix computed by analyzing the spatial relationship of pixel intensities in the refined image, counting the occurrences of pixel pairs with specific intensity values and spatial relationships. The detection stage analyzes the tumor region's extracted features characteristics by labeling the connected components and selecting the region with the highest density to locate the tumor area, achieving a good accuracy of 99.64%. In the classification stage, the system classifies the detected tumor into the normal, pancreatic tumor, then into benign, pre-malignant, or malignant using a proposed reduced 11-layer AlexNet model. The classification stage attained an accuracy level of 98.72%, an AUC of 0.9979, and an overall system average processing time of 1.51 seconds, demonstrating the capability of the system to effectively and efficiently identify and classify pancreatic cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.