Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39752363›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Repellency and toxicity of long-lasting insecticide-treated bed nets (LLINs) to bed bugs.

Christopher C Hayes, Coby Schal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Christopher C HayesDepartment of Entomology and Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3868-4922
Coby SchalDepartment of Entomology and Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7195-6358

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vector control is essential for eliminating malaria, a vector-borne parasitic disease responsible for over half a million deaths annually. Success of vector control programs hinges on community acceptance of products like long-lasting insecticide-treated nets (LLINs). Communities in malaria-endemic regions often link LLIN efficacy to their ability to control indoor pests such as bed bugs (Cimex lectularius L. and Cimex hemipterus (F.)) (Hemiptera: Cimicidae). Despite this, little is known about the potential repellent effects and toxicity of LLINs to bed bugs. Herein, we demonstrate for the first time that commonly deployed LLINs lack olfactory and contact-based repellency to host-seeking C. lectularius from both insecticide-susceptible and insecticide-resistant populations. One LLIN (PermaNet Dual) was significantly attractive to both populations when exposed olfactorily, but not in contact assays, highlighting the complexity of bed bug-LLIN interactions. The insecticide resistant bed bugs experienced low mortality in 4 d of continuous exposure to LLINs. These results suggest that LLINs would likely not repel or eliminate bed bug infestations in malaria-endemic communities, further selecting for insecticide resistance and potentially disrupting vector control programs.

Indexed as

BedbugsInsecticide ResistanceInsecticidesInsecticide-Treated BednetsInsect RepellentsAnimalsFemaleMalariaMosquito ControlInsecticidesInsect Repellents

Identifiers

PMID39752363
PMCPMC11698412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.