ArticlePloS one2025
The use of miniaturised Bluetooth Low Energy proximity loggers to study contacts among small rodents in agricultural settings.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Determining Activity Patterns and Home Range of Wild Bats Using a Proximity Biologging System Based on the Internet of Things (IoT).Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Partitioning Social and Spatial Drivers of Infection Risk.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Small rodents can cause problems on farms such as infrastructure damage, crop losses or pathogen transfer. The latter threatens humans and livestock alike. Frequent contacts between wild rodents and livestock favour pathogen transfer and it is therefore important to understand the movement patterns of small mammals in order to develop strategies to prevent damage and health issues. Miniaturised proximity loggers are a newly developed tool for monitoring spatial behaviour of small mammals. The strength of the Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) signal can be used as an indicator of close contacts between wild rodents and livestock feeding sites, which is relevant for identifying possible transmission routes. This method study focussed on the use of the technology in an agricultural setting as well as dry runs for testing and calibrating this technology in farming environments used for animal husbandry. Results show that the battery life of the loggers was mainly influenced by the pre-set scan interval. Short scan intervals resulted in reduced battery lifespan and should be maximised according to the activity patterns of the target species. Habitat affects BLE signal strength resulting in higher signal strength indoors than outdoors. The height of the location of the loggers positively affected signal strength in livestock stables. Signal reception generally decreased with increasing distance and differed among loggers making calibration necessary. Within habitat specific distances, BLE proximity logging systems can identify contacts among small mammals and between animals and particular structures of interest. These results support the use of BLE based systems in animal husbandry environments and contribute to a body of evidence of validated techniques. In addition, such approaches can provide valuable insights into possible pathogen transmission routes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.